Allan Amador Cervantes claims she told him “since I refuse to talk to her, I was going to suffer the consequences.”
The full response to Allan’s character abusive text message, shown below, can be found at Pattern Evidence & Case Record.
Delineation:
1) The fear of suffering is self-referential
Allan does not talk about harm done to her.
Allan talks about harm that could be done to him.
That tells you his primary mental focus is personal threat, not guilt or empathy.
2)Allan’s suffering is conceptualized as a punishment for not complying
In his frame:
His crime is not rape or abandonment.
His crime is not giving her continued access or attention.
This is a narcissistic reframing:
“Her pain is not real. My pain is the real pain, caused by her.”
3) Allan implies his suffering is inflicted
Not emerging from his own choices.
Not emerging from the original wrongdoing.
It is “done to him.”
That is a self-victim narrative.
It removes agency.
It removes accountability.
4) That phrasing reveals his psychology
A. Allan feels persecuted
B. Allan cannot imagine her as a legitimate victim
C. Allan interprets exposure as “suffering” imposed on him
This is the inversion move.
Allan cannot conceptualize that the consequences he fears flow from his own behavior (rape, deception, lying, triangulation).
His mind must externalize suffering as something a woman is doing to him.
This is textbook identity-preservation.
If Allan admits “I harmed someone,” his identity collapses.
So he narrates: “She wants to make me suffer.”
Because psychologically, that is the only version he can survive.
Full analysis of Allan’s text message here.