I previously noted that Allan’s behavior evokes the detached pathology of a serial killer. The following evidence is merely one chilling illustration. He constructs elaborate fantasies without the slightest pause to test whether they bear any tether to plausible reality—a hallmark of minds that have already begun drifting into darker, more dangerous currents.
In 2018, an anthropologist delivered a presentation titled The Anthropology of Elite Cultures to the University of California, Irvine Department of Social Sciences student body. The presentation examined both intellectual elites and global elites, with particular attention to mechanisms of power, access, and insulation.
This context establishes a documented foundation for evaluating the accuracy of Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes’ psychological profile, which identifies Narcissistic Personality Disorder with grandiose features.
On October 30, 2025, Allan made a sweeping, self-aggrandizing claim. That claim becomes intelligible only when placed against the earlier UCI presentation and its subject matter.
The 2018 presentation opened with a video designed to convey the contemporary impact of elite power. Viewing that video provides necessary context for what follows.
Watch the video. Pay attention to the details behind a true story.
Seven years later, Allan asserted to multiple parties that this anthropologist had sought his assistance in matters involving her ex-husband. The evidentiary record documents this assertion.
At the time Allan met the anthropologist, he was informed, and he repeatedly demonstrated perfect recollection, of the exceptional wealth and influence of her former spouse. Allan understood the scale and nature of that power.
How does this all tie together?
The connection becomes clear upon review of the anthropologist’s background. The analytical insights presented at UCI did not derive from speculation or public reporting alone.
Her knowledge into the exact way in which the online gaming executives joined the lists of global elite, relocated to maintain power, then reinvented their power derived from direct involvement.
The anthropologist lived within those systems. She participated from inception through escalation: contract negotiations, institutional entanglements, and multi-million-dollar litigations. Her proximity produced knowledge inaccessible to the public.
Allan knew this.
Allan’s claim that she sought his assistance in matters involving her ex-husband in that global elite circle reframes reality, positioning himself as a source of authority and access. His inversion reflects grandiosity: the inflation of his role in relation to demonstrably powerful actors, contrary to common-sense facts.
Allan’s claim rests on fantasy. Delusion. Grandiosity.
Grandiosity reaches its most sinister expression here: a 44-year-old man, never married, subsisting in the dim attic of his aging mother’s modest house in a decayed Mexican seaside town—yet solemnly convinced that the intellectual elite have quietly enlisted him as her indispensable ally in shadowy world affairs with the global elite.
The gulf between his actual circumstances and his self-conferred cosmic role is not mere eccentricity; it is a chasm where reality has already collapsed, leaving only the echo of an untested, ever-expanding inner narrative.
Such utter detachment from verifiable evidence is not harmless daydreaming. It is the slow unraveling of a mind that no longer requires evidence to believe itself central to history’s hidden machinery—and histories of violence remind us that when fantasy crowns itself sovereign, the line between declaration and deed can thin to nothing.
Allan is dangerous.
What does any of this have to do with Pamela Sue Martin?
The pattern of pursuing the elite is clear. Pursuing women 20 and 30 years his senior is no mistake. Not about love or attraction. It’s all about money and fantasy of elitism. Go look at his fascination with US presidents and movie stars.