View the more detailed and critical response piece Pattern Evidence & Case Study and Public Protective Notice for deeper insights.

Profile of an Abuser

Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes

Based on real messages provided by five women, this profile exposes a pattern of abuse in La Paz, Baja California Sur—read on to discover the risks.

The researcher’s expertise lies in behavioral psychology, forensic analysis, and criminal dynamics. The researcher’s name is omitted for security reasons. Specific examples throughout the report are redacted due to security concerns.

Summary

Allan’s behavior suggests a charismatic but controlling individual who prioritizes emotional exploitation and image management, with patterns indicative of manipulative tendencies and emotional dysregulation.

Overall, complaints of “cheating, gaslighting, triangulation, and emotional fraud” fit Allan’s profile of relational control through inconsistency, increasing emotional and psychological dangers. The likelihood of these behaviors is high, marked by his occasional empathy (e.g., supportive responses), but cycles predict repetition unless confronted.

Concerns arise regarding the psychological impact on romantic partners, potentially through cycles of idealization and devaluation.

This profile highlights key areas of concern, based on observed communication styles, relational dynamics, and emotional expressions. See the research method at the bottom of this page.

Key Personality Traits

Allan presents himself as articulate, affectionate, and ambitious, often expressing love, gratitude, and shared interests (e.g., politics, history, family) to build rapport. He uses voice messages extensively for emotional delivery, combining vulnerability (e.g., sharing family photos, mourning the death of his brother) with optimism (e.g., political victories).

However, his responses show inconsistency: frequent deletions, missed calls, and abrupt shifts in warmth and affection. He emphasizes family loyalty and piety, projecting a devoted and resilient image.

This contrasts with relational turbulence, suggesting a facade that hides deeper insecurities. Culturally, as a Mexican man, he invokes traditional values such as protection and unity, but patterns imply that these serve self-interest.

Overall, Allan is adaptable and persistent, thriving on connection but struggling with sustained intimacy.

Danger

The emotional/psychological danger is high: Cycles of blocking/unblocking and ignored communications could induce anxiety or instability in romantic partners. Their persistence despite boundaries risks escalating to emotional harassment if rejection intensifies. There is no direct danger to the family, but exploiting grief could indirectly damage relational bonds.

Prediction: The danger manifests itself as relational toxicity; if you feel cornered, you may withdraw or lash out verbally.

Deception

Deception is a recurring theme, often through omission, inconsistency, and/or deliberate fabrication of facts. Allan mirrors his victim’s language to align himself, but abruptly changes without addressing issues.

Declarations of love intensify, but are followed by periods of silence or blockage, suggesting performative elements. Their rationalizations for absences and vague commitments (e.g., recurring noncommittal phrases) imply hiding the whole truth.

Danger

Allan’s avoidant style erodes trust, fostering dependency; patterns suggest habitual self-protection over honesty, risking the destabilization of romantic partners.

We suggest Intolerance

Evasion

Avoidance is Allan’s dominant trait, particularly in conflict or vulnerability.

In addition to avoiding critical threats, Allan repeatedly ignores calls, deletes sensitive content, censors information he dislikes, and rationalizes distance. He deflects deeper discussions (e.g., shifting from emotional topics to superficial affection or politics) and uses references to pity/God to evade responsibility. Interruptions in communication followed by re-engagement indicate emotional repression.

Danger

This pattern of avoidance prolongs unresolved issues, creating relational instability; avoidance may stem from fear of rejection, leading to passive-aggressive cycles that re-traumatize romantic partners.

Case Study

Pursuit Style

Allan’s pursuit is intense and cyclical, combining charm with inconsistency. He initiates contact using love bombing and shared interests to re-engage. The pursuit persists despite explicit boundaries.

He is “hot-cold”: effusive when connected (voice messages, emojis), distant when challenged (silence, deletions). Recent examples show enthusiasm for meetings but abrupt and hostile changes..

Danger

This push-pull dynamic fosters attachment insecurity, similar to intermittent reinforcement.

Victim Story

Manipulation

Manipulation is evident through emotional exploitation and control tactics. Allan invokes family and grief to elicit sympathy (e.g., death of his brother in tributes, photos of nephews), creating artificial bonds.

He reflects his victim’s vulnerabilities (e.g., responding to their openness with reciprocal statements) while controlling the pace. Post-conflict rationalizations shift responsibility. His political/ambitious persona is integrated into chats, possibly to impress or manipulatively align interests.

Danger

High risk of exploiting empathy; patterns suggest calculated efforts to maintain influence, leading to confusion or self-doubt in romantic partners.

How abuse harms communities

Underlying Personality Disorders and Relevant Factors

Allan’s traits align with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD): grandiose elements (e.g., political ambitions), need for admiration, and exploitative dynamics.

Comorbid with Avoidant Personality Disorder: Hypersensitivity to rejection drives withdrawal, masked by charm.

Avoidant-contemptuous attachment style: Craving intimacy but devaluing it when feeling threatened (e.g., silence after vulnerability). Possible Cluster B traits (e.g., borderline elements in emotional volatility; histrionic elements in expressive messaging).

Repression of grief (death of sibling) could exacerbate dysregulation, channeling into relational cycles.

Cultural factors: Family emphasis could conflict with selfish behaviors, amplifying internal tension. No overt substance issues, but stress (e.g., politics) could trigger decompensation.

Danger: Patterns suggest serial relational problems, with high risk of repeating cycles.

Impact of abuse on women

La Paz, BCS, Mexico

General Concerns and Predictions

Allan represents an emotional risk through deceptive, avoidant, and manipulative patterns that could induce dependency or distress in partners.

Allan’s profile and examples fits the “covert narcissist” type: an outwardly affectionate facade hides self-centered control.

Prediction: Allan’s relationships will remain unstable until his romantic partners set boundaries.

Therapy for empathy and grief processing could help, but avoidance reduces the likelihood. Monitor for escalation in high-stress scenarios (e.g., political setbacks).

La Paz, Baja California Sur, México

Methodology

This psychological profile and associated analyses were developed through a rigorous, multidisciplinary research process designed to identify patterns of emotional manipulation and deception based on first-hand accounts. The methodology emphasizes ethical data handling, expert consultation, and systematic analysis to ensure accuracy and credibility, while prioritizing the anonymity and safety of victims.

Research Team and Expertise

The principal investigator is a licensed psychologist with a PhD in Clinical Psychology, specializing in domestic violence, trauma, and interpersonal abuse. His expertise includes linguistic decoding techniques, which involve analyzing linguistic patterns in communications to uncover indicators of manipulation, gaslighting, and emotional fraud. To provide comprehensive cultural and societal context, consultations were outsourced to additional experts, including:

A sociologist focusing on gender dynamics and relational norms in Latin American communities, exploring cultural influences on abusive behavior.
A public health specialist with experience in victim impact assessments, to evaluate the broader psychological and community effects of such patterns.

These consultations ensured a holistic understanding of the behaviors in question, integrating psychological, anthropological, and public health perspectives.

Data Collection

The data was obtained from five women who self-identify as victims of Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes’ alleged manipulative behavior. The participants voluntarily submitted their complete WhatsApp chat histories covering the period from 2018 to 2025. These were provided as .txt files, including:

Text messages with timestamps and dates.
Embedded images.
Voice messages as separate audio files.

To maintain participant anonymity, all submissions were handled through secure, encrypted channels, and personal identifiers (e.g., names, contact details) were redacted prior to analysis. In addition to chat histories, the five women participated in structured interviews conducted by the principal investigator. These interviews focused on contextual details, emotional impacts, and corroborating experiences, lasting approximately 2-3 hours each. We attempted to interview Allan Amador Cervantes, but he ignored our emails and phone calls.

Data Processing and Analysis

Voice messages were transcribed using Rev.com, a professional transcription service, which processed the audio files and returned accurate text versions with timestamps. The resulting transcripts were integrated into the overall dataset.

All data—including text messages, transcripts, images, and interview notes—were compiled into a centralized Excel spreadsheet for systematic labeling and categorization. Each line item (e.g., individual message or voice note) was labeled according to initial categories such as deception, gaslighting, triangulation, and empathy exploitation. Iterative filtering and subcategorization followed, refining the data until core patterns emerged, including idealization-devaluation-discard cycles and mismatches in attachment styles. This qualitative content analysis was supplemented with quantitative metrics, such as the frequency of specific behaviors, to quantify the extent of the patterns.

The analysis adhered to established psychological frameworks, including those from the DSM-5 for personality traits and the Power and Control Wheel for abuse dynamics, while incorporating linguistic markers of manipulation (e.g., vague language, deflection, and false promises).

Resources and Results

The principal investigator devoted 175 hours to the project, compensated at a rate of US$75 per hour, totaling US$13,125. Outsourced consultations added approximately 40 hours among the experts. The comprehensive final report spans 317 pages, detailing summaries of raw data, pattern analysis, and recommendations.

For public presentation, the website content was curated and designed by a professional content creator with expertise in SEO and digital storytelling. The principal investigator and other experts did not participate in the design or public framing of the website to maintain separation between the analytical process and dissemination. All website content is derived directly from the report’s findings, presented in an accessible format to educate and warn potential victims while preserving the confidentiality of sources.

This methodology underscores a commitment to evidence-based inquiry, transforming survivors’ experiences into a tool for awareness and prevention. For inquiries or additional details, contact the site administrator anonymously.

Perfil Psicológico

Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes

La Paz, BCS, Mexico