Category: Facade

  • Insecure Masculinity

    Traditional masculinity bundles three pillars: protector (solves threats), provider (secures resources), and stoic enforcer (controls emotional space). Allan’s claims target all three: He claims he was enlisted to help with an ex-husband (he wasn’t); he claims he was in a position to support a woman (he wasn’t); and he claims he maintained dominance through silence (abuse, see Weaponizing Silence).

    When the three pillars of masculinity are falsified, as Allan did, the performance signals insecure masculinity—a man borrowing cultural scripts he hasn’t earned. This often stems from anxious attachment or narcissistic fragility: the louder the boast, the deeper the deficit. See Pattern Evidence & Case Record for further details.

    Escalation risk: Men who overclaim competence retaliate when exposed. Silence-withdrawal fails → expect blame-shifting, gaslighting, or aggressive reassertion, such as you see in his claims.

    Allan Amador Cervantes
    Allan Amador Cervantes

    Mexico Cultural Lens: Machismo scripts amplify provider/enforcer roles. A man failing both yet still performing them, as he does in his claims, may signal economic insecurity disguised as dominance—common in contexts where emotional safety nets are weak, which we see in his use of family and friends to bolster his claims of hatred toward the truth-teller.

    Bottom Line

    Falsified claims don’t just reveal Allan’s weakness—they expose a strategic identity built on his vulnerabilities. Treat it as a red flag for manipulation, not a masculinity to rehabilitate.

    Disengage early.

  • Coincidence

    Allan alleges they want HIS financial support! Allan’s claim reflects an absurd view of reality, radically misaligned with the evidence he himself presents.

    The truth speaks: Allan prostitutes himself to elderly American women. The motive is clear.

    Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
    Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
  • When Poverty Creates Predators

    The Tragedy of Romance Fraud in La Paz

    Poverty is not funny. Poverty in places like La Paz is heartbreaking. Many people in La Paz told me the truth: opportunity is extremely small. People work hard, for very low pay, and most will never escape their situation. When we see a poor Mexican man, age 44, romantically chasing women 30 or 35 years older, this behavior does not come from love. It comes from desperation, and lack of opportunity.

    However, the problem becomes serious when deception begins. Men like Allan do not show the truth. Allan posts images standing next to someone else’s car or home. Allan speaks in vague language to make the public think he is some swag dude traveling the world. Allan hides the fact that his lifestyle is not his own, but that of an older woman. His entire online image is a false identity, down to the strong arm emoji.

    Allan is not harmless. Allan is a fraud. Allan and men like him are not asking for charity. They are creating a false self in order to trap a woman with more resources. They want a green card, housing, money, or a way out.

    He contributes a little in the beginning until his credit card maxes out. Then the woman pays the cost. Allan hopes to gain freedom.

    Allan Amador Cervantes
    Allan Amador Cervantes

    Women must recognize this pattern and protect themselves. The danger is not only financial loss. The danger is the emotional impact of deeply intimate deception.

    In the image below, we have Allan’s social media posts at Pamela Sue Martin’s ranch. And without a touch of editing, we present his true home, his true view.

    The disparity between his real life and the life he presents and is chasing is surreal.

  • Fraud in Intimacy: Strategy for Personal Gain

    Fraud is the act of gaining benefit by lying.

    When a man, such as Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes, lies to a woman to get sex, money, housing, travel, or immigration advantage, he is committing fraud. He is gaining valuable things from her under false terms. He is presenting himself as something he is not. He promises things, including love, he never intends to give. This is not “playing around.” This is not romance. This is not misunderstanding. This is deliberate deception for personal gain.

    Allan Amador Cervantes
    Allan Amador Cervantes

    Fraud in business is punished. Fraud in banking is punished. Fraud in government documents is punished. Yet when fraud happens in intimate relationships, people tend to ignore the financial and emotional loss. They call it “bad breakup.” They call it “dating mistake.” But it is the same category of harm. A woman gives time, money, gifts, care, and sex based on false information. He receives profit. She receives loss. That is the definition of fraud.

    Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes is a fraud.

    Calling it “love” does not make it less criminal. Calling it “relationship issues” does not make it less serious. Women are targeted every day by men like Allan who want financial access without effort.

    Allan grooms victims with fake romance. Allan manipulates women to give resources they would never give if they knew the truth.

    This is fraud, and society needs to treat it as fraud, because it steals from women in every dimension of their lives.

  • Until She Learns the Truth

    More abuser tactics for the narcissistic:

    When one supply source threatens exposure, run to the other supply source and secure it.

    She is the most vulnerable to the exact deception pattern outlined in Allan’s psychological profile.

    Allan is actively bonding tighter to prevent losing her. She is in the jurisdiction where his deceptive sexual behavior is criminal. Silence protects him, not her.

    He will repeat the same abuse cycle until she learns the truth and/or she is harmed.

    “Patterns suggest efforts calculated to maintain influence, risking destabilization of romantic partners.”

    Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes

    Beware of the Mexican Gigalo

  • Collapse of Dignity

    Behind the social media posts, Allan is insecure and guarded

    His motive is to project momentum—to suggest that he is travelling, evolving, and succeeding. It’s a performative play, meant to contrast with stagnation or guilt. The overall messaging signals loneliness and a need to manage impressions carefully. What appears as openness online masks an emotionally sealed inner world.

    Allan’s social media strategy is to establish trust and loyalty. He wishes to appear dependable and admired: “I am fine and stable.” The effect he seeks is reassurance from others that he is a good, steady person.

    Loss of Self-Respect

    Despite the calm surface, Allan has lost dignity and self-respect. He may gain likes, but his internal sense of moral authority has weakened.

    The staged images are a shell around exhaustion and reduced self-esteem. His “travel the USA” motif is not a celebration of freedom, happiness, or success but an attempt to stay ahead of inner stagnation in his mother’s decayed attic. 

    Constant Effort 

    Allan’s social media persona requires constant effort to maintain. Behind the smile and the scenic background lies:

    • Strain and vigilance – he is besieged, as though he must continually defend his ground or reputation.
    • A need to appear strong – the photo becomes armor; it signals, “I’m fine, I’m still standing,” even when he feels outnumbered by criticism or shame.
    • Isolation – Allan is emotionally alone, fending off unseen challengers. His social media admiration does not equal belonging; it’s a fortress of presentation. 

    His mother’s idolization on social media only serves to solidify her co-perpetration: she knows everything. 

    He keeps posting to prove momentum and control. He is fighting to preserve a few loyal supporters. He knows his authority is eroding, and this public mask is his last line of defense.

    So the serenity you see on social media isn’t genuine calm or content; it’s a sustained act of resistance—a disgraceful man trying to hold his ground as the truth unveils itself.

    Gigoló mexicano