She says Allan licked the cum of another man from her pussy.
Allan Amador Cervantes
Translation: “Allan arrived about an hour later. I did not even have time to shower. He came in wanting sex, wanted to get intimate quickly. He wanted to go down on me and give me oral. And I let him. I let him taste what another man had just left inside me.”
— Survivor
She had the abilty to just say “NO” when Allan wanted sex, wanted oral sex with her.
Instead, she let him taste another man’s sperm. Digest another man’s DNA. Swallow another man’s spiritual essence.
Physical attraction is non-negotiable rocket fuel for lasting desire. Without it, resentment festers, and you end up staring at the ceiling wondering why you settled. Science backs this: attraction hinges on symmetry and health cues that “ugly” simply doesn’t deliver, dooming you to muted passion and quiet regret — especially if he’s also bad in bed. (Be honest with yourself, you know damn well this was the worst fuck of your life and without the love-bombing manipulation and pity, you would not have ever given him a second glance.)
Worse, kindness backfires spectacularly (as shown in several cases with Allan!)
Boost his ego with a woman out of his league and watch the monster awaken: newfound confidence convinces him he can go for even better. Allan’s fragile masculinity, scarred by years of rejection, refuses to settle now that he’s tasted premium pussy. Despite your beauty, intelligence, and kindness, he’s using Facebook (again), chasing all possibilities, leaving you wondering who the fuck this guy thinks he is—proof that charity dating is emotional Russian roulette.
Allan Amador Cervantes
Spare yourself the farce!
“Evolution didn’t wire us to play ego booster for ugly men.
Demand a man who excites you from day one, not a sagging-bellied, low IQ, poverty-stricken, sewers-of-Mexico halitosis, incestuous mommy attachment, low-principled, fake “Christian,” lying sack-of-manure “project” who’ll outgrow the pity that ensnared you.” — Survivor of Allan’s Violence
You deserve genuine lust, not the inevitable betrayal of an insecure man who deluded himself into believing he is a good catch.
Reality check. Allan has absolutely nothing to offer you. He weaponizes love. In a weak moment, you fell for it and now you can’t look me in the eyes and tell me you are genuinely attracted to him.
Our survivor support team is here to help you. Contact us.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes Cheats on Everyone!
Lisa was a 75-year old American grandmother who he arranged to meet at Cafe Exquisito in La Paz. When she confronted him about flirting with her, he responded that there was no reason not to—despite the multiple women who thought he loved them.
What a dick. Pendejo.
Then he has the audacity to act offended that covert operations were an absolute necessity to unveil the truth. Typical gaslilghting abuse tactic: Reverse the blame, one of Allan’s favorite violences against women.
Allan expected her to remain silent. He expected her to bear his shame. He expected what every woman before her had been conditioned to do: absorb the damage he inflicted, protect his reputation, and disappear.
He relied on secrecy as a shield and impunity as a birthright. He believed his betrayal would dissolve without consequences because it always had.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
She delivered the opposite. Instead of vanishing, she publicized. Instead of carrying the shame he assigned to her, she returned it to its rightful owner. The behaviors he expected to remain hidden became permanently archived with receipts and witnesses.
Allan weaponized love; she weaponized visibility.
He relied on impunity; she deployed consequence.
Power shifts when silence meets the full force of exposure.
Your claim that I wanted your help with my ex-husband and your claim that I wanted you to support me is an incredible embarrassment for you. I am embarrassed for you.
I know that you know both of these things are astronomical lies with not even the slightest fragment of truth. Embarrassing lies. Just as the lie that “your house” was being remodeled when in fact you had no house and lived with your mother.
Aren’t you ashamed? Aren’t you humiliated by your own lies? What’s it like knowing that I know the truth and that I know for a fact that you are a delusional liar? What an embarrassment!
And there’s not a single shred of evidence you can produce to even remotely justify such absurd nonsense lies!
If you are not humiliated by being caught in these lies (and more), then you are most certainly a sociopath.
How could you lie so much? Why not just tell me the truth as soon as you knew it? You could have made life so much easier for both of us. It wasn’t enough to desecrate one white woman?
Coward
You are a disgusting coward, Allan. The bowels of the Beast.
Men’s sexual violence against women often stems from a fragile masculine identity that equates dominance with worth. When a man feels powerless in broader life—economically, socially, or emotionally—he may compulsively assert control over a woman via abuse tactics to reclaim the sensation of potency. Rape becomes a desperate ritual to prove “I am not the one who can be penetrated, violated, or reduced”; in other words, the terror of being dominated himself is displaced onto her. The erect phallus weaponizes the very vulnerability he refuses to feel.
This dynamic reveals a hidden homoerotic panic at the core of patriarchal violence: the male perpetrator unconsciously fears that without absolute supremacy over women, he risks occupying the “feminized” position of the dominated. Sexual violation is therefore less about desire for the woman than about terror of becoming her—of being entered, owned, or erased. By violating her boundaries, he symbolically castrates his own dread of submission, yet the act only deepens the cycle of shame and compensatory brutality. True liberation for men lies not in dominating others, but in tolerating the vulnerability that dominance was meant to obliterate.
Allan Amador Cervatnes
Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic framework links sexual violence to unresolved Oedipal conflicts and primal aggression. In Totem and Taboo (1913), he posits that patriarchal societies originate from sons’ murderous rivalry with the father, culminating in guilt-driven totemism. Applied to rape, the perpetrator reenacts this parricide symbolically: violating a woman displaces castrating anxiety onto her, warding off the father’s imagined retribution.
Traditional masculinity bundles three pillars: protector (solves threats), provider (secures resources), and stoic enforcer (controls emotional space). Allan’s claims target all three: He claims he was enlisted to help with an ex-husband (he wasn’t); he claims he was in a position to support a woman (he wasn’t); and he claims he maintained dominance through silence (abuse, see Weaponizing Silence).
When the three pillars of masculinity are falsified, as Allan did, the performance signals insecure masculinity—a man borrowing cultural scripts he hasn’t earned. This often stems from anxious attachment or narcissistic fragility: the louder the boast, the deeper the deficit. See Pattern Evidence & Case Record for further details.
Escalation risk: Men who overclaim competence retaliate when exposed. Silence-withdrawal fails → expect blame-shifting, gaslighting, or aggressive reassertion, such as you see in his claims.
Allan Amador Cervantes
Mexico Cultural Lens: Machismo scripts amplify provider/enforcer roles. A man failing both yet still performing them, as he does in his claims, may signal economic insecurity disguised as dominance—common in contexts where emotional safety nets are weak, which we see in his use of family and friends to bolster his claims of hatred toward the truth-teller.
Bottom Line
Falsified claims don’t just reveal Allan’s weakness—they expose a strategic identity built on his vulnerabilities. Treat it as a red flag for manipulation, not a masculinity to rehabilitate.
