Strength in men has never been only about muscle. Strength has always included responsibility, protection, and the instinct to shield women and children from harm. Historically, men were raised to take serious leadership roles inside the family. They were raised to defend, to provide, and to stand between danger and the people they love. A real man protects women because this is the core role of masculine energy at its best.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervatnes
Today, many men are physically weak, emotionally passive, and sexually confused. One major piece of this problem is low testosterone. This is a global epidemic. Testosterone is not simply a hormone for sex. Testosterone is a biological driver of ambition, energy, responsibility, productivity, courage, and protection. When testosterone drops, a man’s drive drops. A man who is supposed to protect becomes a man who avoids responsibility.
Men who obtain sex through liesor false stories are committing a violent act that harms the whole person. When a woman gives consent based on false information, the consent is not real. Her body is being used under false conditions. Her mind is being tricked. Her emotions are being exploited. This is not a mutual choice. This is a violation of her right to decide based on truth.
Allan Amador Cervantes
Sexual consent requires honest information. When a man hides his intentions, hides major facts, or manipulates a woman with false claims of love, marriage, or loyalty, he steals her ability to choose. He forces her to participate in a sexual act she never would have chosen if she had known the truth. Her body is not the only thing that suffers. Her trust, her self belief, and her sense of safety suffer as well.
This is rape of the soul, body, and mind. It may not look violent on the surface. But the internal damage is deep. Women who have been deceived in this way often feel confusion, self doubt, shame, and grief. They feel invaded, not only physically, but psychologically. When sex is gained through deception, it destroys the foundation of human intimacy. It is a crime against the most private parts of a human being.
One woman’s story of being tricked into sexual relations with Allan: You Raped Me, Allan.
No longer hiding his violence in plain sight, Allan finally admits one truth: He is violent toward women.
“She started writing a blog against me because she told me that since I refuse to talk to her, I was going to suffer the consequences.” — Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
If it’s not immediately to you how or why this statement, independent of other statements, is a confession of violence in an intimate relationship, don’t hesitate to let the Allan Cervantes Survivor Support Team know. We’ll be happy to show you the codes.
Allan is violent toward women. We thank him for moving toward truth rather than continuing to hide behind false personas on social media.
His victim, who we have reason to believe is the one mentioned in the featured text message, states that she has not attempted to enter into dialogue or conversational engagement with him since the day he committed an undeniable act of violence against her February 27, 2025 — eight full months before he authored the above confessional.
During the Covid pandemic, Sophie—a divorced mother with disabilities, 16 years older than Allan—moved from California to La Paz. She sought relief from lockdowns, rehabilitation through swimming the Sea of Cortez, and opportunities to volunteer for social causes.
Allan targets disabled woman trying to rehabilitate in Sea of Cortez
Facebook suggested Allan as a connection. His public profile presented him as a university rector and community figure. Sophie reached out, believing he could direct her toward volunteer opportunities. From the beginning, her intention was clear: service to the community, not romance.
But Allan’s response was not professional. By their second meeting, he invaded her personal space, he followed her home without consent, and he lied about where he lived. Sophie rejected him, but Allan pressed forward, promising introductions to volunteer opportunities. Soon he was swimming beside her, camping with her, dining with her.
For nine months, Allan concealed the truth about his living situation. He claimed to own a house being remodeled, managed by his brother, Christopher. In reality, he owns no property and he lives in his mother’s attic. When exposed, he said Sophie could not visit him at his mother’s house because his mother dislikes visitors. Witnesses confirm those excuses are false. Years later, having forgotten his lie, Allan also inadvertently confirmed this is false.
The deception served a purpose: to mask his poverty and to position Sophie’s luxury penthouse as a free lover’s pad.
This pattern continued. Allan feigned wealth, spoke of his substantial savings and investments, but let Sophie pay for dinners, hotels, and travel. When inside her penthouse overlooking the Mogote, he acted like a kept man—giving orders to staff, sweeping floors, lingering on the sofa, and “forgetting” personal items when he left so he would have to return. He offered love without action, commitment without cost. Un gigoló.
The financial imbalance grew clearer when Allan visited Sophie in California. He spoke of building a life together but expected her to fund it. He promised love and fidelity. Instead, he cultivated simultaneous relationships with other women, concealing them through lies: “I lost my phone,” “I am busy with politics,” “there’s no reception in Todos Santos,” “Kenno is sick.” He disappeared for weekends and holidays using his family as alibis while reassuring Sophie of his love.
When Sophie asked him before moving permanently to La Paz—risking her career, finances, and leaving family behind—he swore:
“I absolutely want you here with me.”
She drove a thousand miles across the desert on that promise, investing thousands of dollars, only to arrive to chaos. Allan was already entangled with Jody Waterman, conducting a public, sexually charged online relationship. He was secretly pursuing Pamela Sue Martin in Todos Santos and Idaho. And he was chasing pussy of all ages and nationalities, including a minor, all while keeping Sophie as his sexual doormat and financial safety net.
Suddenly, in summer 2023, Allan claimed his “rich cousin in Washington” had paid his first class expenses to Washington to help his cousin’s child.
I want to reiterate: Allan used not just this child in his lies, but also his minor nephews on other occasions.
In reality, this “rich cousin” was Pamela Sue Martin, thirty years his senior. Allan raved about her wealth and how “he” was paying for everything: dinners, flights, and all other travel expenses. The elaborate lie revealed the indisputable Mexican-gigolo strategy:
Allan targets older, wealthier women, using deceit to gain sexual access and financial benefits.
Allan’s deceit-for-sex career carries a critical legal implication: Idaho’s rape laws provide for prosectution for Artifice, Pretense, or Concealment and California law provides similar protections.
Un Gigoló Méxicano, Estafador Extraordinario
Family Complicity
Allan did not act alone. His family enables him. His mother knew he was traveling to various US states to spend time with different wealthy women old enough to be his mother.
Maria Elena cannot claim ignorance of his motives. Allan’s own words implicate his brother Christopher and sister-in-law Fernanda, who chauffeured him to airports. Allan further confided that Fernanda coached him on how to build trust and intimacy with these women.
The deception was not hidden from family; it was facilitated.
Family must consider their their own position, their own family standing, and draw a clear line between Allan’s disgrace and their households:
Protege a tu propia familia: tu matrimonio, tus hijos, la reputación de tu hogar.
No te dejes atrapar por la falsedad de Allan.
Elimina la contaminación: asegúrate de que tu rama del árbol genealógico no se vea mancillada por el engaño y la deshonra de Allan.
Allan lied for sex. He lied for money. He lied when truth would have served him better.
The lies multiplied beyond what one interview can contain. Sophie became ill under the weight of Allan’s chaos. She told him she was breaking down. Instead of easing the harm, Allan escalated it—feigning empathy while deepening betrayal. She left La Paz six months later, burdened with all the costs of migration, relocation, and remigration, while Allan continued to whisper promises: “I love you more than you know. I am coming soon to be with you. Kenno is sick.”
Kenno, Allan’s brother, was indeed sick. But Allan’s cruelty had nothing to do with that reality. Kenno was simply another alibi to cloak Allan’s relationships with other women.
In the end, Sophie received a single message that opened the floodgates of truth.
The pattern is undeniable: Allan lied for sex, lied for money, lied when truth would have served him better. His deceit is not incidental—it is pathological.
And his family stands by him, complicit in the harm.
In the below image, a young lady rightfully feels compelled to threaten Allan with violence for his ongoing inappropriate contact with her…three months after he told her mother he loved her…in a text message…one day after Allan was photographed in bed with Sophie.
Having trouble keeping track of Allan’s poor personal boundaries? There’s plenty more to see if you care to vomit.
“Therefore each of you must put off falsehood and speak truthfully to your neighbor, for we are all members of one body.” Ephesians 4:25 (NIV)
When one supply source threatens exposure, run to the other supply source and secure it.
She is the most vulnerable to the exact deception pattern outlined in Allan’s psychological profile.
Allan is actively bonding tighter to prevent losing her. She is in the jurisdiction where his deceptive sexual behavior is criminal. Silence protects him, not her.
He will repeat the same abuse cycle until she learns the truth and/or she is harmed.
“Patterns suggest efforts calculated to maintain influence, risking destabilization of romantic partners.”
The first time someone told me that Allan is a liar, a user, and an abuser of women, I was incensed. Outraged! Furious.
I responded to that woman with scathing rebuke.
The Second Time
The second time someone told me that Allan was abusing women, I was angry. I denied it. It couldn’t be true. He is so charming and polite.
The Third Time
The third time someone told me that Allan was abusing women, I paused. I asked Allan about it. The idea was ridiculous, he said. “She’s a jealous woman, she’s crazy,” he told me.
The Fourth Time
The fourth time someone told me that Allan was abusing women, I investigated. I was deeply concerned by the evidence I found. I confronted him. He scoffed. I will never forget that smirk on his face.
The Fifth Time
The fifth time someone told me that Allan was abusing women, I investigated again. Allan was lying to me.
The Reign of Hell Began
I confronted him. He lied. I confronted him again. He lied again. I confronted him again. He created total destruction and chaos while simultaneously kissing me, telling me he loved me, and making love to me.
I Left Him
He pursued me again. Still avoiding the truth.
I left him again.
I Forgave Him
I should not have.
I wasn’t the only one he was lying to.
I wasn’t special. I wasn’t loved. This wasn’t the “Once in a Lifetime Love” we whispered about.
I was someone he was using because he needed admiration and attention. A ticket to the USA. That’s all.
Allan Sexually Violated Me.
The lies. The lies were emotional fraud.
But bringing someone else’s sexual energies into my bed, into my womb. Without my permission. He desecrated me.
idealization — emotional fraud & love bombing: I love you more than you know and I can’t wait to build memories together; our connection is even beyond ourselves. I cherish and relish all of your being; the purest feeling for one another; I always felt it; I love you since the very first time I saw you with an indescribable strength and passion; I am grateful for your love and kindness. I love you, regardless time and distance you are with me and I am with you, darling.; You are so important and valuable to me, beyond I can express. I love you deeply and passionately; We are building strong and deep memories, as well as pages in our lives. All I need and want is you❤️🔥; I am fully grateful for having found each other; how important you are in my life and all what you brought to me since I saw you that first time. You are my once in a lifetime.The intensity of my feelings for you is something never experienced before, the force that attracts me to you is so deep, authentic, and strong that stands on its own feet; I don’t want to be apart from you. You can count on me and I can rely on you for whatsoever. We were as two persons sharing the most valuable resources we have that are time and affection, and what I want always to be the foundation of our relationship no matter how it is named, expressed or lived, while HONEST. The best days of my life and it is because you were there, with me, renewing my heart and giving me what you are in the most pure sense of your existence. I LOVE YOU, I really mean it.
devaluing — lies, triangulation, gaslighting (You cannot come with me; I was working; I need to cancel our weekend plans -my brother needs me to drive him to Todos Santos; my nephews want me to take them to dinner; I lost my phone in Todos Santos over the weekend so I couldn’t call/text; my mother is planning dinner, she doesn’t like people so you are not invited; an important political figure is in town so I need to cancel weekend plans; I’m translating for court at night; I am in Washington (Idaho) with my cousin (Pamela Sue Martin), I will call you tomorrow, I will call you later, how dare you confront me about such a thing; stop asking me “what time!”; I’m not talking to you about how I feel!)
discarding — click
Shock. Chaos. Confusion.
Letter Received
Your boyfriend is sleeping with another woman. Here’s proof.
I could have Handled the Truth
“I don’t love you, I don’t want to be with you” would have been good enough for me. I could have walked away years sooner with dignity. With my sacred womb in tact.
Living with Anger
Now. I am angry at myself for overlooking the obvious.
Angry at myself for forgiving him.
Angry at myself for trusting his words when he said, “I want you here with me.”
Angry at myself for not realizing it was all about the money and the USA. It wasn’t about me.
I make no apologies for shining light on this truth.
I Hope No One Else Gets Hurt
His public persona is a fascinating study in the art of deception.
People want to believe what they see.
4000 Fake Followers
Thank You God
I’m deeply grateful for your gifts.
Violence in La Paz, Baja Califronia Sur
Note on Transparency: In the interest of accuracy and fairness, We will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content.
Abusers often project a public persona of strength and confidence to mask deep-seated insecurities, a behavior that becomes more pronounced under public scrutiny. This curated image—whether through charm, dominance, or displays of control—serves as a shield to hide vulnerabilities. In private, their insecurity may manifest as manipulation or aggression to maintain power over others, but in public, they double down on this “strong & happy” facade to deflect criticism or exposure. This dynamic is rooted in their fear of being seen as inadequate, driving them to craft an image that demands admiration rather than authenticity.
“Va a mi gym y se clava mirando a las morras como si fuera deporte. La neta, cómo nos echa ojo está bien creepy. Le decimos de broma ‘el galán’, pero la verdad nos da mala vibra, entonces tratamos de andar en bola cuando está por ahí. No es normal.” –Afectada
Social Media Overcompensation for Fragile Pride.
The intensification of this behavior under scrutiny often stems from an abuser’s need to maintain control over their narrative. When challenged or exposed, their insecurity fuels defensive tactics like exaggerated displays of confidence to preserve their carefully constructed persona. For example, an abuser might respond to criticism with grandiose boasts or public displays of authority to reassert dominance and suppress doubts about their character. This pattern not only protects their fragile self-image but also manipulates how others perceive them, making it harder for their abusive behavior to be recognized or addressed.
Abuse survivors must understand this behavior to recognize the disconnect between an abuser’s public image and their private actions. Awareness empowers survivors to break free from the manipulation, rebuild trust in their own perceptions, and seek support without being swayed by the abuser’s carefully crafted persona. By understanding this dynamic, survivors can better navigate their healing journey and protect themselves from further harm.
Awkward attempts at public displays of normalcy or success
Each new “I’m strong” post looks like damage control. The more he fights to maintain control of his image, the more the performance exposes his weakness.
He has no real path to recover his image without confronting the truth — and he won’t. Particularly as he surrounds himself with enablers rather than those who help him accept responsibility and transform for the betterment of self, his victims, and his community.
For Survivors We know the journey from shock to denial to realization to anger to recovery. If you need support along your journey, we are committed to protecting your identity. Reach out to us by email.
Note on Transparency: In the interest of accuracy and fairness, We will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content.
Woman is a gift of life, unity, and shared dominion.
Across history, Scripture has drawn a clear line between what God gives and what the forces of destruction seek to consume.
In Genesis 2:22, the phrase “he brought her to the man” implies a divine act of presentation — woman as a gift of life, unity, and shared dominion. In Revelation 12:4, the Beast stands before the woman, ready to devour what she brings forth.
“The beast I saw resembled a leopard, but had feet like those of a bear and a mouth like that of a lion. The dragon gave the beast his power and his throne and great authority.” — Revelation 13:2
What God gives as a gift, the Beast seeks to destroy.
Patterns of Abuse
Patterns of emotional and psychological abuse are clear and consistent:
Idealization — overwhelming attention, promises, and moral posturing.
Devaluation — gaslighting, triangulation, lying, public humiliation, emotional sabotage.
Discard — withdrawal, chaos, ghosting, and refusal to provide truthful discourse.
When a man convinces a woman to trust him, to love him, to be with him and then abuses her, the pattern moves beyond imitation of evil into embodiment of it.
Such men stand condemned in the eyes of God, for they wage war against His creation, His image-bearers, and His gift to man.
One recent example in La Paz shows how this pattern manifests in real life. Multiple survivors, across years, describe the same sequence of behaviors.
Tactic One: Triangulation
Triangulation is when an abuser uses a third party to provoke jealousy or competition, destabilizing the relationship and asserting control.
Example: Survivors report that Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes used Jody Waterman as an instrument of triangulation to devalue his partner, [redacted].
As his defense, he mocked Jody as “crazy” for her “mysterious” obsession with him — even ridiculing her for purchasing the same book (How to Love) that his girlfriend, [redacted], had gifted him.
“He was calling Jody crazy and I was thinking maybe she is crazy. But something inside of me kept thinking he is responsible for her craziness because no woman idealizes a man like that without significant encouragement. These public posts must be just the tip of the iceberg.” — [redacted]
Tactic Two: Gaslighting
Gaslighting is the deliberate distortion of reality to make the victim question their own perceptions, often accompanied by shaming language.
Example: When confronted, Allan erupted into a torrent of gaslighting — even calling [redacted] a “teenager” for questioning his and Jody’s public messages on Facebook. This occurred just three months after he encouraged [redacted] to move to La Paz at her expense, while simultaneously pursuing multiple other women, at least one Idaho woman who clearly believed Allan was her loyal partner at the time.
[redacted] clarified Allan’s allegation that she did contain herself and talk “in front of him” about it, so his attack served as additional layers of painful gaslilghting.
Tactic Three: Labeling
Abusers often neutralize credibility by attaching derogatory labels to those who confront them.
Example:
Allan labels Jody “crazy.” Pamela is “insanely jealous.” He dismissed [redacted] as “disrespecting his space” and “trespassing boundaries” when she confronted his triangulation.
This is the “mask” — public morality and virtue-signaling that conceals private exploitation.
Allan’s posts about Christian virtue, cute kittens, travel to beautiful places, and family values serve as intentional public distractionsfrom his private reality.
In present-day Mexico — where violence against women is layered, nuanced, and multidimensional — these patterns are part of a continuum of harm that too often ends in femicide.
Why Silence is Deadly
Silence and shame cause even the strongest women to collapse — and when a woman collapses, so do her children’s futures.
“Cry aloud, spare not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and show my people their transgression.” — Isaiah 58:1
To remain silent is to hand the Beast our souls.
Speaking Protects the Next Victim
If you have experienced emotional, spiritual, or relational abuse, ourSurvivor Support Team is here to listen, believe you, and connect you with resources in full confidentiality.
Truth is the first act of protection.
These are not “private issues.” They are part of the continuum of harm that ends in femicide. We cannot remain silent.
Note on Transparency: In the interest of accuracy and fairness, We will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content.
In the holy book of Revelation, “the Beast” is a satanic instrument of chaos, deception, and destruction, seeking to dominate and devastate humanity on a global scale.
La Paz, BCS Mexico
Triangulating Mother & Daughter
Today, we learned through evidence that, in addition to exploiting elderly women, Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes pursued a mother and her daughter just two weeks apart, while emotionally defrauding and bedding other women during the same two-week period. THE MARK OF THE BEAST.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes’ debauchery is aligned with the Beast
Conquer & DestroyWomen
Evidence shows: Allan love bombs, gaslights, emotionally defrauds, triangulates, and discards women as if they are Satan’s whores instead of God’s sacred gifts.
Allan is not simply a prolific abuser camouflaging himself behind a carefully curated mask of Christian morality and patriarchal virtue.
Allan is not a sinner in need of redemption.
Allan is an active, irredeemable enemy of God.
“The Beast was given power to wage war against God’s holy people and to conquer them.”
Revelation 13:7 (NIV)
The women Allan abused are honorable women. Loyal servants of God. Most are mothers who carried heavy crosses to not only survive, but ensure her children thrived against all odds. Many are elderly (30+ years his senior). Some without fathers or brothers to protect them. Open, vulnerable hearts. Perfect targets.
I vomitted as I penned this post to relieve my throat of choking agony. Viewing evidence of the Beast’s spiritual warfare against a mother and her daughter was a bigger lump than I could swallow. My body had to expel the shock and horror.
Your Testimony is Spiritual Victory
God promised triumph over the Beast through testimony:
“They triumphed over him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony; they did not love their lives so much as to shrink from death.” —Revelation 12:11 (NIV)
Beware of carefully curated public images
The Beast’s destruction is swift, complete, and orchestrated by God
The Beast does not prevail in his battle with God. Along with a False Prophet, he is thrown alive into the “lake of fire burning with sulfur” (Revelation 19:20), a symbol of eternal torment and final judgment. This act destroys the Beast’s physical and spiritual influence forever, without any resurrection or further opportunity to abuse God’s women like Satan’s whores.
“And I saw what looked like a sea of glass glowing with fire and, standing beside the sea, those who had been victorious over the beast and its image and over the number of its name. They held harps given them by God.”
—Revelation 15:2 (NIV)
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
Through direct divine judgment, Allan’s reign of terror is over. A Faithful and true leader has emerged, leading the armies of heaven. He calls upon us to use our power, the gifts He bestowed upon us, to help others see Him, His light, His glory, and to experience His faithful love.
Your Story
We are committed to protecting your identity. If you have a story or evidence you think we should be aware of, contact us by email.
When a young, innocent girl experiences such disgust at your hands that she is compelled to threaten you with violence, you are God’s enemy.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
Violence Baja California Sur, Mexico
Note on Transparency:
In the interest of accuracy and fairness, we will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content.
“Allan didn’t just betray me—he violated me on a level so profound, I’m questioning what counts as rape.”
He treated me inhumanly.
Watching him play the victim role only deepens my questions about his humanity.
Note on Transparency:
In the interest of accuracy and fairness, We will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content, nor has he provided contradictory evidence. See: The Avoidance–Image Management Cycle
Publishing Note: This reflection documents the psychological and emotional impact of prolonged emotional abuse. Shared anonymously to protect the writer’s safety, it centers the lived reality of survivors.
Allan Alexander Amador Cerantes
I do not speak to destroy Allan. I speak because silence almost destroyed me.
Some forms of abuse leave no bruises. No hospital visits. Only a slow disintegration of self. One day, I looked in the mirror and wondered, “Who have I become?”
This is what Allan did to me.
Allan did not start by yelling or threatening. Instead, he used intimacy. A curated tenderness that masked a deep need for power and control. At first, I felt chosen. Seen. Revered. Later, I was simply erased. No longer human.
Allan courted me until I trusted him. Then he vanished. Returned. Shared private pain. Vanished again. Refused to answer phone calls and WhatsApp messages. Made excuses that never aligned with his “I love you’s.”
He offered promises. Then he didn’t bother to fulfill them. He lied so frequently and with such certainty that I began to distrust my own perception.
Every concern I voiced was turned against me. In asking for the bare minimum, I became “bad.” I asked basic questions: Do I matter to you? He responded with traumatizing contempt.
Emotional abuse works by eroding your sanity. Your sense of reality begins to diminish. You apologize. Minimize. Wait. Hope.
Meanwhile, Allan moved on to someone else—secretly, surgically, refusing me closure. I could have handled the truth, but he robbed me of the opportunity to make an informed decision by lying. When I confronted him, he simply lied again. When pressed for clarity, he created chaos that left me gobsmacked. Allan intentionally and systematically disempowered me.
I thought:
If I were thinner, prettier, younger, richer.
If I expected less than the bare minimum.
If I were quieter about the discrepancies in his tales.
If I hadn’t needed anything at all.
Then maybe he would treat me with the same love that rolled off his tongue so easily: “I love you.”
Or maybe he would consider me human.
The spiral of emotional fraud nearly ended me.
Many women die in silence from emotional abuse. I almost joined them.
I wanted the pain to stop, but I was disoriented and torn between a bond Allan had carefully weaved and his abuse. Tearfully, I begged him. I told him how I felt about his lies, about his abuse. I told him what was happening to me. I was collapsing psychologically. He did not care.
I contemplated ending my life, making it appear accidental so that it would hurt my family less. I imagined a bottle of tequila and sleeping pills would end the pain Allan caused me.
Many women die in silence from emotional abuse. And I almost joined them. Emotional abuse is that violent.
But I didn’t die.
I wrote instead.
Allan may never face the consequences of his violence in court or a prison. But bringing the gravity of Allan’s conduct to light is another form of justice. The justice of truth made visible. The justice of naming the violence what it is: violence. The justice of no longer carrying the weight of his abuse alone.
Allan will not apologize. He prefers avoidance and enlisting others in a false victim narrative.
Two important issues: 1) Allan’s immediate reaction is triangulation–pitting the public against his accuser; and 2) Allan took to Facebook to control the narrative rather than apologize. True victimology looks much different than this. Allan’s post is instead a confession of guilt.
Why speak out now after years of silence?
During my period of silence, Allan hurt other vulnerable women.
Knowing that my silence paved the road for Allan to abuse another woman makes me sicker than the abuse I personally endured.
In the interest of accuracy and fairness, We will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content, nor has he provided contradictory evidence. See: The Avoidance–Image Management Cycle
Victimology in the context of psychological domestic violence, particularly involving years-long systematic gaslighting, emotional fraud, and triangulation, focuses on understanding the impact on the victim’s psyche, behavior, and lived experience.
Below, we outline the core traits, reactions, and experiences of a woman subjected to abuse, grounded in psychological patterns observed in such dynamics. The following insights are structured to be concise yet comprehensive, reflecting the complex interplay of emotional manipulation and its effects.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
Erosion of Self-Esteem:
Years of gaslighting—being told her perceptions, memories, or feelings are wrong—leads to profound self-doubt.
Emotional fraud, such as false promises or deceit about intentions, deepens her sense of unworthiness, as she internalizes blame for the relationship’s failures.
Hypervigilance and Anxiety:
She becomes attuned to her partner’s moods, constantly monitoring his behavior to avoid triggering criticism, manipulation, or rejection.
She may experience chronic anxiety, fearing she’s “not enough” compared to others in a triangulated dynamic.
Dependency and Attachment:
Despite the abuse, her disorientation from the abuse fosters emotional dependency, often reinforced by intermittent reinforcement (alternating affection and cruelty). This creates a trauma bond, making it hard to leave.
She may idealize the abuser, clinging to memories of his “good” moments.
Emotional Exhaustion:
The constant manipulation drains her emotionally, leading to feelings of hopelessness, fatigue, or numbness. She may lose interest in hobbies or social connections, as her energy is consumed by navigating the abuse.
Cognitive Dissonance:
She struggles to reconcile the man she loves with his abusive behavior, creating internal conflict. Gaslighting exacerbates this, as she’s conditioned to doubt her own understanding of the relationship.
Reactions to the Abuse
Self-Blame and Guilt:
She internalizes the abuser’s narrative that she’s at fault for his behavior or the relationship’s problems.
Triangulation intensifies self-blame, as she compares herself unfavorably to the other women in the triangulation.
People-Pleasing Behavior:
To regain her partner’s approval or avoid conflict, she may suppress her own needs, opinions, or emotions, becoming overly accommodating or submissive.
She might work harder to “prove” her worth, whether through emotional labor, physical appearance, or compliance with his demands.
Isolation:
The abuser’s tactics, like criticizing her loved ones or creating drama, often lead to social withdrawal.
Triangulation can alienate her from others, as she’s manipulated into distrusting friends or family who challenge the abuser.
Defensive Coping Mechanisms:
She may develop maladaptive coping strategies, like dissociation (emotionally detaching to endure the pain), denial (minimizing the abuse), or hyper-rationalization (e.g., “He’s acting this way because his brother is sick.”).
In some cases, she might mirror the abuser’s tactics (e.g., becoming manipulative herself) as a survival mechanism, though this is less common.
Ambivalence About Leaving:
Despite the pain, her love and trauma bond create ambivalence.
Lived Experiences
Constant Reality Distortion:
Gaslighting makes her question her memories or perceptions.
Over time, she may rely on the abuser to define reality, further entrenching her dependency.
Emotional Rollercoaster:
The relationship oscillates between intense highs (when he’s affectionate or remorseful) and devastating lows (when he’s cruel or dismissive).
Loss of Identity:
Years of prioritizing the abuser’s needs erode her sense of self. She may lose touch with her values, passions, or goals, feeling like a shadow of her former self.
Emotional fraud, such as feigned commitment or love-bombing, leaves her mourning the “person” she thought he was.
Physical and Mental Health Decline:
Chronic stress from psychological abuse can manifest as physical symptoms (e.g., insomnia, headaches, digestive issues) or mental health struggles (e.g., depression, anxiety, PTSD-like symptoms).
The covert nature of psychological abuse makes it hard for her to articulate her pain or seek help.
If she tries to share her experiences, she might face minimization (e.g., “It’s not like he hit you”), deepening her isolation.
Long-Term Impact
Trust Issues: After years of manipulation, she may struggle to trust others.
Rebuilding Self-Worth: Recovery involves unlearning the abuser’s narrative and reclaiming her reality.
Resilience and Growth: With support, she can develop post-traumatic growth, gaining clarity, self-compassion, and stronger boundaries, though the journey is nonlinear and challenging.
Notes
Cultural Context: Her experiences may be shaped by cultural norms (e.g., expectations to prioritize relationships or stigma around leaving abusive partners), which can intensify guilt or isolation.
Gender Dynamics: While men can also experience this abuse, women are statistically more likely to face psychological violence in heterosexual relationships, often tied to power imbalances.
Seeking Help: Therapy (e.g., trauma-focused CBT or EMDR), support groups, and resources like domestic violence hotlines can aid recovery. Validating her reality is critical, as gaslighting undermines her ability to trust her own experiences.
Note on Transparency:
In the interest of accuracy and fairness, We will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content, nor has he provided contradictory evidence. See: The Avoidance–Image Management Cycle