Clinical Communication Analysis

This page displays a specimen message from Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes dated October 30, 2025, followed by a clinical micro-analysis of the communication structure and alignment with previously documented patterns across multiple women.

This is not a personal opinion piece. It is a behavioral case study.

View the more detailed and critical piece Pattern Evidence & Case Record and Psychological Profile for deeper insights.

Section 1: Specimen Message

Screenshot Evidence

Transcription of Message:

Devour Her Like a Lion: A Case Study in Triangulation & Gaslighting – Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
https://allancervantes.com/2025/08/11/revelation-12-4/

What is this? 😒

Allan’s response: Hello dear Jody. It is a woman I used to date 3 years ago and she created this to extort me since I discovered a lot of inconsistencies in her behavior and she wanted to take advantage of me because she had a serious problem with her exhusband that barred her to see her son because she is manipulative and terribly unstable. She wanted me to have a place in La Paz where she could live with me and I entirely pay for her expenses. She even created a false lawsuit against me (falsifying the logo of the government of BCS and taking randomly from my Facebook account the name of a Canadian friend of mine (whose husband and family I know) saying I was violent to her while we had a relationship (she, her family and I have just been acquaintances), absolutely false. She started writing a blog against me because she told me that since I refuse to talk to her, I was going to suffer the consequences. I just ignored her cause I don’t want to have any communication with her and ALL THE LIES SHE WROTE are despicable and have nothing to do with me. She had been using fake names and accounts to do that, and I am seriously thinking of sueing her cause IN ALL THE LIES SHE WROTE SHE INVOLVES FAMILY AND FRIENDS THAT ABSOLUTELY, AS I DO, DEPLORE HER.

Section 2: Behavioral Codes and Psychological Alignment

This communication specimen demonstrates a set of behavioral codes that align directly with the independently developed psychological profile.

This alignment is documented in:

• Pattern Evidence & Case Record

• Psychological Profile (Independent Research Team)

Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes

Here is the alignment:

1. Allan avoids rebutting actual evidence

Live observation:

he does not defend facts, he invents a different set of “facts”

The report calls this:

avoidance and deception through inconsistency and manufactured narratives

2. Character assassination to discredit witness credibility

Live observation:

immediate character assassination

The report calls this:

idealization / devaluation cycles as a primary relational control strategy.

3. Allan imagines third-party validation

Live observation:

he invents “family and friends” who “hate” the victim

The report notes:

use of family, third parties, and “imagined consensus” as props in identity protection.

4. Allan calls exposure “extortion”

Live observation:

he interprets exposure of his behavior as lethal threat to identity

The report calls this:

“need for admiration” + “habitual self-protection over honesty”— narcissistic injury response

5. Allan uses abandonment as weapon

Live observation:

refusal to communicate framed as punishment (“I ignored her”)

The profile:

“blocking” push-pull manipulation to destabilize emotional regulation

6. Positioning himself as the victim of the victim

Live observation:

reframes himself as the persecuted party, claims she is “manipulative,” “unstable,” “created a false lawsuit,” and that he is under threat from her actions

Profile alignment:

reversal of victim and offender is Allan’s hallmark defense pattern; psychological literature defines this as self-exoneration through role inversion, used to invalidate the harmed party and secure sympathy for himself

7. The diagnostic frame matches evidence

Live observation:

narcissistic-psychopathic blend with identity-preservation panic

The report identifies:

Narcissistic Personality Disorder with avoidant attachment and deception as core defense

Summary

In total: this WhatsApp message is a live specimen of the exact pattern predicted by the psychological profile. It is not merely consistent. It is confirmatory evidence of the model.

The formal psychological report described a narcissistic-psychopathic blend with identity-preservation panic. This observed message performs those traits in real time.

Allan is not reacting to HER. He is reacting to a perceived annihilation threat to his self-constructed public persona.

This micro-analysis is strong, accurate, and matches the formal clinical description point for point.

Section 3: Allan’s Victimology Statement

In the specimen message, Allan claims she told him “since I refuse to talk to her, I was going to suffer the consequences.”

The record shows a demand an apology for rape, not silence, and an absence of any threat.

Delineation:

1) The fear of suffering is self-referential

Allan does not talk about harm done to her.
Allan talks about harm that could be done to him.

That tells you his primary mental focus is personal threat, not guilt or empathy.

2) Allan’s suffering is conceptualized as a punishment for not complying

In his frame:
His crime is not rape or abandonment.
His crime is not giving her continued access or attention.

This is a narcissistic reframing:
“Her pain is not real. My pain is the real pain, caused by her.”

3) Allan implies his suffering is inflicted

Not emerging from his own choices.
Not emerging from the original wrongdoing.
It is “done to him.”

That is a self-victim narrative.
It removes agency.
It removes accountability.

4) That phrasing reveals his psychology

A. Allan feels persecuted
B. Allan cannot imagine her as a legitimate victim
C. Allan interprets exposure as “suffering” imposed on him

This is the inversion move.

Allan cannot conceptualize that the consequences he fears flow from his own behavior (rape, deception, lying, triangulation).

Allan’s mind must externalize suffering as something a woman is doing to him.

This is textbook identity-preservation.
If Allan admits “I harmed someone,” his identity collapses.

So he narrates: “She wants to make me suffer.”
Because psychologically, that is the only version he can survive.

Pattern Evidence & Case Record is an open confrontation personal accountability statement highlighting and responding to Allan’s gaslighting with legal documentation of abuse patterns. A must read for the safety and protection of anyone involved with Allan.