Allan Amador Cervantes is most certainly the most violent man in La Pas, Baja California Sur or even in all of Mexico. Why?
Not because of the emotional blood he spilled—though there is plenty—but because his violence is architectural.
He built his violence over years: blueprints of deception, load-bearing lies, hidden passages of alibi. Every victim is studied, courted, isolated. He doesn’t explode; he engineers. Friends and family are recruited as pillars in his façade—unwitting shields—until the structure of violence stands complete and lethal.
Allan’s absence of remorse is the final cruelty. When confronted, he never flinches. He denies with serene certainty, redirects blame with surgical calm, as if the rapes, the fraud, the shattered lives were mere misunderstandings he was too macho to acknowledge. That refusal—that arrogant, airtight refusal to account for what he knows he has done—is the deepest cut. It leaves wounds that never close, bleeding doubt into everyone who had ever believed him.
True violence in a serial predator often lies less in the physical act than in the sustained psychological domination—planning erodes autonomy, deception recruits bystanders into complicity, and denial gaslights entire communities. This creates a wider radius of harm than any single act of physical violence.
See You Soon: A Tool of Psychological Manipulation
Allan uses the phrase “see you soon” as a weapon to manipulate relationships by persistently uttering the phrase without any genuine intent to follow through.
Allan’s tactic, known as FUTURE FAKING, involves dangling vague promises of future contact or commitment to string someone along, often keeping them as a secondary option while pursuing primary interests elsewhere.
Allan Amador Cervantes
By repeatedly saying “I’ll see you soon” or “I’ll call tomorrow” without action, Allan fosters hope and emotional investment, ensuring his victim remains available and compliant—waiting patiently on the sidelines.
When confronted about the lack of follow-through, Allan deflects responsibility by blaming “cultural differences,” claiming that in Mexican culture, “soon” (like “pronto” or “ahorita”) is inherently flexible and not meant literally. This excuse weaponizes a real cultural nuance to evade accountability.
Allan shifts blame onto a woman’s “unreasonable” expectations or supposed character flaws, conditioning her to suppress questions. Any pushback triggers anger, withdrawal, sulking, or silent treatment, punishing her for demanding clarity and reinforcing compliance through fear of abandonment.
“This is exactly what Allan did to me. He shouted at me for seeking confirmation of “when, what time,” as if I was the unreasonable person. He always, for years and to the bitter end, told me, “I will see you soon,” “I will call you tomorrow” and I now realize just how insidious and how abusive he really is.” — Survivor of Allan’s Abuse
Allan’s pattern is sinister and pathological: it degrades self-esteem, destabilizes emotional security, and maintains control via intermittent hope mixed with chronic lying and parallel relationships.
Recognize it as abuse, not culture—true cultural flexibility doesn’t involve deliberate deception or punitive reactions to boundaries.
Abusers exploit any stereotype (cultural, gender, or otherwise) to gaslight; document patterns and seek support to break the cycle. Prioritize actions over words for healthier connections.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes is a psychologically violent man. Do not mistake his outward kindness, lack of direct confrontation, or passive-aggressive communication style as anything short of violent.
Imagine, if you will, being emotionally violent enough to issue a press release announcing your relationship status to one elderly woman while hotly pursuing multiple other elderly women (weaponizing love in writing for financial gain) while simultaneously enlisting friends and family to join you in holding your secrets and carrying your anger.
Allan is still on the loose adding more victims to his conquests. Meanwhile, he attempts to re-victimize his victims by discrediting them (she’s unstable, she’s crazy) and gaslighting with more lies.
Clinical Narcissistic Personality Disorder NPD is a severe, impairing disorder involving grandiosity, lack of empathy, and fragile self-esteem.
Allan fakes empathy through rehearsed, modeled behaviors, with profound emptiness underlying this façade. His grandiose fantasies of political importance or office-holding are disproportionate to his intellectual limitations, while fragile self-esteem manifests in his social media posts.
Critical note: Allan’s discard tactics are RARE, almost non-existent, outside of narcissistic personality disorder.
We emphasize that “narcissistic personality disorder” is not used casually here; such misuse dilutes the term, stigmatizes mental health, and distracts from true sufferers—who rarely seek help due to limited insight. The designation reflects serious consideration.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
“Allan’s surreptitious behavior reminds me of “Dexter Morgan.” If I saw a story on the news saying authorities discovered Allan killed and buried hundreds of people in the desert, it would not surprise me . I finally see this man for who he really is and it’s a haunting sight.” — Survivor of Allan’s Abuse
She says Allan licked the cum of another man from her pussy.
Allan Amador Cervantes
Translation: “Allan arrived about an hour later. I did not even have time to shower. He came in wanting sex, wanted to get intimate quickly. He wanted to go down on me and give me oral. And I let him. I let him taste what another man had just left inside me.”
— Survivor
She had the abilty to just say “NO” when Allan wanted sex, wanted oral sex with her.
Instead, she let him taste another man’s sperm. Digest another man’s DNA. Swallow another man’s spiritual essence.
When did you first notice that you deplore her, darling?
Was it before or after you used other women to desecrate her?
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
🖕 🖕 🖕
What is Allan angry so about? He’s the one that violated her.
Allan relied on a coherent identity architecture that allowed him to function without internal contradiction.
That architecture included:
A self-image as a socially respectable man
A sexual secrect that kept his behavior invisible
A family and community mirror that reinforced his false image
Control over who knew what, when, and in what framing (due to his pathological lying)
This structure did not require him to be honest. It required him to be unchallenged.
Along comes a woman who not only sets boundaries, but who challenges him. And when he attempts to silence her, she does not disappear. Instead, she speaks more loudly and to a wider audience.
Her narrative did not merely accuse. It re-mapped.
Specifically, it:
Named patterns he had not named himself
Linked private sexual behavior to public meaning
Connected individual acts to family enablement and social shielding
Removed his ability to localize the issue as “a misunderstanding”
She did not attack one single action. She attacked the logic that allowed his actions to exist.
That is destabilization.
When Allan’s structure collapsed, he had two choices:
Integrate the information, take responsibility and apologize, and reorganize his identity to prevent future failings
Externalize blame and attempt suppression
His “I deplore her and so do my family and friends” points to the second option.
Now her narrative lives outside his control. She refuses to accept the silence and shame he attempted to delegate to her.
Even if no one reads the website dedicated to his honor:
It exists
It is indexed
It is searchable
It contradicts his false persona
That contradiction, which he cannot control despite his carefully crafted public mask, produces obsessive rage: “I deplore her.”
How is the rage helping Allan? The logical step is to ask him. Unfortunately, he is unable to speak truthfully about anything, so any answer he provides will be complete bullshit.
Allan was recently caught in another lie. Unfortunately, we cannot expose it without compromising the safety of informants. But the lie is quite significant, as it involves his immediate family. As previously highlighted in his psychological profile and in “Bueno Allan,” he used his family and friends to bolster a claim that is not just false, but harmful to his family.
We also learned recently that in December 2022, Allan used his poor mother as an exuse and alibi for why he couldn’t travel for Christmas. The real reason: Pamela Sue Martin. Yet, just three months later, Allan told his California girlfriend he wanted her in La Paz with him, compelling her to make a 1000 km journey by car to be with him.
He literally lied to his girlfriend about Pamela since at least July 2022. He was lying when he visited her in California. And he has never told the truth to this day. She only discovered their love affair through a third party three years later.
Three years of confusing behaviors, reality distortion, and spinning lies is a long time. Enough time to establish malicious criminal intent.
False reality does not mean fantasy or idealization.
It means:
Ongoing deception
Withheld information that would have altered choice
Parallel lives and concealed behaviors
A relational frame that was structurally false
The key point: She consented to a version of reality that did not existdue to Allan’s deliberate deception.
That produces rape, not a mutually fun night at the El Moro Hotel.
This does not imply:
She was naive
She imagined intimacy
The sexual bond was fake
It means the attachment was formed using corrupted inputs due to Allan’s intentional emotional fraud.
Why Allan belongs in jail
Allan’s emotional fraud, multiple sexual violations, and blatant discard tactics caused real-world harm, which he refuses to acknowledge.
The impact of his conduct is criminal. If he had resources worth suing for, that could potentially help mitigate the damages. But he is not only financially poor, he is spiritually bankrupt.
Therefore, the only socially suitable consequences is jail, where he can experience the same sexual violations he perpetrated on innocent women: Non-consensual.
… And I thank God every day For the girl He sent my way But I know the things He gives me He can take away
Lyrics by Benson Boone, “Beautiful Things” 2024
Some people move through life with an awareness that what God gives is fragile. What is given can be taken away as quickly as it arrives.
Others choose defiance. They spit in the face of God and abuse every gift placed in their care.
Such is the case of Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes.
Allan repeatedly degraded and devalued the women God placed in his life. His toxicity did not stop there. It spread into the bodies and souls of the family entrusted to him.
Allan himself admitted, in multiple ways and on multiple occasions, that his lineage is toxic. As the oldest child in a family abandoned by its father, he carried the greatest responsibility. Instead of interrupting the damage, he transmitted it, into siblings, into family systems, and into the friends God gave him.
He now claims they share his hatred. They deny this.
“I lived long enough to witness what was unfolding: a disaster of Biblical proportion. I warned him more than once: live your life with passionate leadership.
At Café Exquisito, Allan scoffed. He dismissed my words as worthless.
What I did not know then, because Allan was lying, was that my appeals were already too late. He had already picked a fight with God, determined to win something that amounted to nothing.”
— Survivor of Allan’s fight with God
Allan’s fight continues.
Allan still exposes family, friends, and women he uses to his toxicity. He recruits them into his hatred of a woman he violatedand later failed to silence.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes picking fights with God
We are commanded to face those we have violated before we approach God:
“Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother or sister has something against you, leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to them; then come and offer your gift.“ Matthew 5:23-24 (NIV)
Allan refuses obedience.
This man could read every book ever written on leadership and remain unchanged. The commands were already given two thousand years ago. If he will not follow them, no modern author can rescue him.
Prayer without obedience is not faith. Self-comparison to Job is not humility.
God’s word does not require reinterpretation. It requires compliance.
Physical attraction is non-negotiable rocket fuel for lasting desire. Without it, resentment festers, and you end up staring at the ceiling wondering why you settled. Science backs this: attraction hinges on symmetry and health cues that “ugly” simply doesn’t deliver, dooming you to muted passion and quiet regret — especially if he’s also bad in bed. (Be honest with yourself, you know damn well this was the worst fuck of your life and without the love-bombing manipulation and pity, you would not have ever given him a second glance.)
Worse, kindness backfires spectacularly (as shown in several cases with Allan!)
Boost his ego with a woman out of his league and watch the monster awaken: newfound confidence convinces him he can go for even better. Allan’s fragile masculinity, scarred by years of rejection, refuses to settle now that he’s tasted premium pussy. Despite your beauty, intelligence, and kindness, he’s using Facebook (again), chasing all possibilities, leaving you wondering who the fuck this guy thinks he is—proof that charity dating is emotional Russian roulette.
Allan Amador Cervantes
Spare yourself the farce!
“Evolution didn’t wire us to play ego booster for ugly men.
Demand a man who excites you from day one, not a sagging-bellied, low IQ, poverty-stricken, sewers-of-Mexico halitosis, incestuous mommy attachment, low-principled, fake “Christian,” lying sack-of-manure “project” who’ll outgrow the pity that ensnared you.” — Survivor of Allan’s Violence
You deserve genuine lust, not the inevitable betrayal of an insecure man who deluded himself into believing he is a good catch.
Reality check. Allan has absolutely nothing to offer you. He weaponizes love. In a weak moment, you fell for it and now you can’t look me in the eyes and tell me you are genuinely attracted to him.
Our survivor support team is here to help you. Contact us.
Do not allow the perpetration of violence through your silence.
The only way the patterns of violence — idealization, devaluation, & discard — go away is through illumination.
You are not alone. Your voice is valuable. Your confidentiality is protected. You have permission to confront and protest.
No more violence.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
I was terrified of speaking out. Terrified for my family, terrified for my safety. The measures I took…the people I had to speak to…the money I had to invest in safety precautions.
But I was more haunted by the silence. My silence was an unspoken contract between Allan and I…a contract that permits him to abuse other women with impunity for the rest of his life. And I considered the damage he was doing to my people, my sisters and I could not live with that.
You can contact the survivor support team for help. They are not about revenge. They are about safety of the women Allan targets and will target in the future.
— Survivor of Allan’s Violence
Incidents of physical assault, Dr. Evan Stark argued, were only the most visible part of domestic abuse. Psychological violence, through tactics such as triangulation, which Allan employed for years and still employs, are a far more devastating pattern of subjugation, closer to kidnapping or slavery, that Dr. Stark called “coercive control”.
If you are involved with Allan and you are sick, confused, depressed, anxious, insecure, angry, and/or engaging in covert surveillance to “learn the truth” — there’s good reason for it.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes is a master manipulator. A monster.
Many psychologists are not trained to deal with the impact of this level of sociopathy. He does not care about you because he cannot care about you. Love is a facade, used as a weapon to ensnare you in a trap that helps him avoid loneliness, sexual grief, and his true financial prospects.
You need expert help to deal with this expert manipulator. Do not minimize the weight of this warning.
Do not attempt to confront Allan alone. He will explode with gaslighting rage, blaming his victims, using family and friends as “his army” to evidence his righteous stance. If you are not prepared, you will be destabilized by his reaction. This has already happened to several women.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes Cheats on Everyone!
Lisa was a 75-year old American grandmother who he arranged to meet at Cafe Exquisito in La Paz. When she confronted him about flirting with her, he responded that there was no reason not to—despite the multiple women who thought he loved them.
What a dick. Pendejo.
Then he has the audacity to act offended that covert operations were an absolute necessity to unveil the truth. Typical gaslilghting abuse tactic: Reverse the blame, one of Allan’s favorite violences against women.
Maria Elena’s core failure was cowardice in boundary-setting, first with the man she rewarded with three children despite his sustained sexual, spiritual, and psychological violation of her (chronic lying, serial infidelity, and refusal to grant her legitimacy or commitment).
She then repeated the identical pattern with her eldest son, Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes: she replaced the absent father with the son, turning him into a surrogate spouse. She relies on his constant emotional availability, actively discourages his independence, and keeps a 44-year-old intellectually limited man in her attic—unmarried, serially unstable in relationships, and functionally incapacitated.
This dynamic is not mere enmeshment; it is emotional incest. She enables and even participates in his abuse of other women (he openly admits she joins him in raging against the one partner who finally confronted him). By doing so, Maria Elena does not discipline or protect; she colludes, preserving her own parasitic attachment at the price of her son’s adulthood and the safety of every woman he encounters.
Consider the wider lens: this is a closed intergenerational circuit of avoided consequences. No external accountability was ever imposed—on the father, on herself, or on the son—so the pathology simply migrated inward and downward. The result is a middle-aged man who remains an emotional child and a mother who prefers a crippled captive to the terror of genuine separation. Until the umbilical cord is cut by force (legal, therapeutic, or social), the damage will continue replicating.
Allan Amador Cervantes
This created the perfect narcissistic hothouse: his needs were always primary, his rage always validated, and separation always framed as betrayal. Deprived of normal developmental frustration and accountability, Allan internalized grandiosity without empathy, entitlement without reciprocity—classic NPD forged not by spoiling alone, but by a mother’s terrified refusal to ever let him become a separate adult.
“I sometimes try to make excuses for him to argue with myself that he really is not THAT bad. Maybe he lied because he didn’t want to hurt me. But that argument quickly falls apart because the truth was the path of least resistance; the truth is the one thing that would have brought peace in the most graceful and dignified manner.
No, he acted out of evil intent. He intentionally deceived me (and her). He’s still hiding the truth even three years later.
The lies were not about protecting me. The lies were about cheating me, controlling knowledge, preventing me from informed decision-making. For his sake. For his sexual and predatorial deviance.
I cannot make any excuse for him that stands up to reason. Simply put, Allan is a predator, a rapist, an abuser, a liar, a manipulator. And his family are enablers.
The Amador Cervantes clan are the potholes of society.”
Allan expected her to remain silent. He expected her to bear his shame. He expected what every woman before her had been conditioned to do: absorb the damage he inflicted, protect his reputation, and disappear.
He relied on secrecy as a shield and impunity as a birthright. He believed his betrayal would dissolve without consequences because it always had.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
She delivered the opposite. Instead of vanishing, she publicized. Instead of carrying the shame he assigned to her, she returned it to its rightful owner. The behaviors he expected to remain hidden became permanently archived with receipts and witnesses.
Allan weaponized love; she weaponized visibility.
He relied on impunity; she deployed consequence.
Power shifts when silence meets the full force of exposure.
Don’t commit to anything and when you do, your commitment meant nothing…always subject to cancellation when someone offered you a better time.
Call, but call so late you know I am sleeping. Or write instead. And write complete nonsense aimed at causing confusion rather than clarity.
Don’t answer the phone.
Don’t read my messages. Or read messages days later.
Say you are busy. Family. Court. Important person you need to see who just suddenly popped into town (remember that one?). Pretend you are important (you aren’t).
Say you love me to keep me hanging on, to make me confused, to cause me to doubt reality.
Avoid truth at all costs.
In the midst of all the abuse, you love me more than I could possibly know, you said.
You’ll call tomorrow, you said.
All along, you were in bed with another woman telling her you love her.
Also planning your next conquest. Couldn’t risk being alone.
You sexually assaulted me. You raped me, Allan. That triangular sex was not consensual. That makes you a sex offender. A rapist. A man who violates women (plural).
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes Deserves to be RAPED by a Man
If justice is served, a man will strip Allan of his clothing, bend him over, spread his ass, forcibly insert a dick in his ass, fuck him violently from behind, choke him, pull his hair and scream over and over again, “You are never going to forget this,” cum all over him, then throw Allan to the floor assaulted and humiliated just as he does to women when he is jacked up on viagra.
Statement from one of Allan’s victims:
You are a disgusting PIG, Allan. You deserve to be violently raped by a man. That is the only justice for what you did.
You speak of your hatred. You speak of your family’s hatred. You are the bowels of the Beast with your arrogant hatred because I exposed your disgusting violence.
My contempt for you on the other hand is because YOU RAPED ME, ALAN. YOU RAPED ME!!! YOU RAPED ME. I never consented to the sexual violence you committed against me.
You have no humility, no humanity. You are a rapist.
You deserve to be raped. What man will handle you the way you handled me?
This text message conversation is not a threat against anyone. It is merely a representation of extreme harm caused to multiple women and the feelings provoked.
Allan Alexander committed acts of terror against vulnerable women and he should pay for his crimes.
Your claim that I wanted your help with my ex-husband and your claim that I wanted you to support me is an incredible embarrassment for you. I am embarrassed for you.
I know that you know both of these things are astronomical lies with not even the slightest fragment of truth. Embarrassing lies. Just as the lie that “your house” was being remodeled when in fact you had no house and lived with your mother.
Aren’t you ashamed? Aren’t you humiliated by your own lies? What’s it like knowing that I know the truth and that I know for a fact that you are a delusional liar? What an embarrassment!
And there’s not a single shred of evidence you can produce to even remotely justify such absurd nonsense lies!
If you are not humiliated by being caught in these lies (and more), then you are most certainly a sociopath.
How could you lie so much? Why not just tell me the truth as soon as you knew it? You could have made life so much easier for both of us. It wasn’t enough to desecrate one white woman?
Coward
You are a disgusting coward, Allan. The bowels of the Beast.
Esta mañana me desperté con pesadillas sobre lo que Allan Alexander Amador Crevantes me hizo durante años. Mentiras, manipulación psicológica, abusos sexuales, traición a mi confianza, descubrir que es un gigoló, un embaucador, un narcisista. – Superviviente del abuso de Allan
Men’s sexual violence against women often stems from a fragile masculine identity that equates dominance with worth. When a man feels powerless in broader life—economically, socially, or emotionally—he may compulsively assert control over a woman via abuse tactics to reclaim the sensation of potency. Rape becomes a desperate ritual to prove “I am not the one who can be penetrated, violated, or reduced”; in other words, the terror of being dominated himself is displaced onto her. The erect phallus weaponizes the very vulnerability he refuses to feel.
This dynamic reveals a hidden homoerotic panic at the core of patriarchal violence: the male perpetrator unconsciously fears that without absolute supremacy over women, he risks occupying the “feminized” position of the dominated. Sexual violation is therefore less about desire for the woman than about terror of becoming her—of being entered, owned, or erased. By violating her boundaries, he symbolically castrates his own dread of submission, yet the act only deepens the cycle of shame and compensatory brutality. True liberation for men lies not in dominating others, but in tolerating the vulnerability that dominance was meant to obliterate.
Allan Amador Cervatnes
Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic framework links sexual violence to unresolved Oedipal conflicts and primal aggression. In Totem and Taboo (1913), he posits that patriarchal societies originate from sons’ murderous rivalry with the father, culminating in guilt-driven totemism. Applied to rape, the perpetrator reenacts this parricide symbolically: violating a woman displaces castrating anxiety onto her, warding off the father’s imagined retribution.
Traditional masculinity bundles three pillars: protector (solves threats), provider (secures resources), and stoic enforcer (controls emotional space). Allan’s claims target all three: He claims he was enlisted to help with an ex-husband (he wasn’t); he claims he was in a position to support a woman (he wasn’t); and he claims he maintained dominance through silence (abuse, see Weaponizing Silence).
When the three pillars of masculinity are falsified, as Allan did, the performance signals insecure masculinity—a man borrowing cultural scripts he hasn’t earned. This often stems from anxious attachment or narcissistic fragility: the louder the boast, the deeper the deficit. See Pattern Evidence & Case Record for further details.
Escalation risk: Men who overclaim competence retaliate when exposed. Silence-withdrawal fails → expect blame-shifting, gaslighting, or aggressive reassertion, such as you see in his claims.
Allan Amador Cervantes
Mexico Cultural Lens: Machismo scripts amplify provider/enforcer roles. A man failing both yet still performing them, as he does in his claims, may signal economic insecurity disguised as dominance—common in contexts where emotional safety nets are weak, which we see in his use of family and friends to bolster his claims of hatred toward the truth-teller.
Bottom Line
Falsified claims don’t just reveal Allan’s weakness—they expose a strategic identity built on his vulnerabilities. Treat it as a red flag for manipulation, not a masculinity to rehabilitate.
Idealization and devaluation form the oscillating core of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), manifesting as “splitting”—a primitive defense where the other is all-good or all-bad. In NPD, idealization serves self-aggrandizement: the partner is “love-bombed” with excessive praise and mirroring to secure narcissistic supply, creating an addictive pedestal. The narcissist flips from intense expressions of love to devaluation, weaponizing contempt, silence, and attachment to gain superiority, as these tactics inherently destabilize his victim by causing oxytocin and dopamine withdrawal symptoms, fostering dependency.
Devaluation erupts abruptly: ghosting enforces erasure, lying distorts reality (gaslighting). In NPD, the pivot often stems from narcissistic injury.
This swing is not mere moodiness but a structural fracture in self-cohesion. Narcissist then point to the victim as “unstable” and assert himself as the more stable, knowing partner. Unbeknownst to most narcississt, however, is that power and control experts transparently understand this play and it is well documented in scholarly archives.
Allan Amador Cervantes claims she told him “since I refuse to talk to her, I was going to suffer the consequences.”
The full response to Allan’s character abusive text message, shown below, can be found at Pattern Evidence & Case Record.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
Delineation:
1) The fear of suffering is self-referential
Allan does not talk about harm done to her. Allan talks about harm that could be done to him.
That tells you his primary mental focus is personal threat, not guilt or empathy.
2)Allan’s suffering is conceptualized as a punishment for not complying
In his frame: His crime is not rape or abandonment. His crime is not giving her continued access or attention.
This is a narcissistic reframing: “Her pain is not real. My pain is the real pain, caused by her.”
3) Allan implies his suffering is inflicted
Not emerging from his own choices. Not emerging from the original wrongdoing. It is “done to him.”
That is a self-victim narrative. It removes agency. It removes accountability.
4) That phrasing reveals his psychology
A. Allan feels persecuted B. Allan cannot imagine her as a legitimate victim C. Allan interprets exposure as “suffering” imposed on him
This is the inversion move.
Allan cannot conceptualize that the consequences he fears flow from his own behavior (rape, deception, lying, triangulation). His mind must externalize suffering as something a woman is doing to him.
This is textbook identity-preservation. If Allan admits “I harmed someone,” his identity collapses.
So he narrates: “She wants to make me suffer.” Because psychologically, that is the only version he can survive.
Allan alleges they want HIS financial support! Allan’s claim reflects an absurd view of reality, radically misaligned with the evidence he himself presents.
The truth speaks: Allan prostitutes himself to elderly American women. The motive is clear.
Poverty is not funny. Poverty in places like La Paz is heartbreaking. Many people in La Paz told me the truth: opportunity is extremely small. People work hard, for very low pay, and most will never escape their situation. When we see a poor Mexican man, age 44, romantically chasing women 30 or 35 years older, this behavior does not come from love. It comes from desperation, and lack of opportunity.
However, the problem becomes serious when deception begins. Men like Allan do not show the truth. Allan posts images standing next to someone else’s car or home. Allan speaks in vague language to make the public think he is some swag dude traveling the world. Allan hides the fact that his lifestyle is not his own, but that of an older woman. His entire online image is a false identity, down to the strong arm emoji.
Allan is not harmless. Allan is a fraud. Allan and men like him are not asking for charity. They are creating a false self in order to trap a woman with more resources. They want a green card, housing, money, or a way out.
He contributes a little in the beginning until his credit card maxes out. Then the woman pays the cost. Allan hopes to gain freedom.
Allan Amador Cervantes
Women must recognize this pattern and protect themselves. The danger is not only financial loss. The danger is the emotional impact of deeply intimate deception.
In the image below, we have Allan’s social media posts at Pamela Sue Martin’s ranch. And without a touch of editing, we present his true home, his true view.
The disparity between his real life and the life he presents and is chasing is surreal.
When a man, such as Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes, lies to a woman to get sex, money, housing, travel, or immigration advantage, he is committing fraud. He is gaining valuable things from her under false terms. He is presenting himself as something he is not. He promises things, including love, he never intends to give. This is not “playing around.” This is not romance. This is not misunderstanding. This is deliberate deception for personal gain.
Allan Amador Cervantes
Fraud in business is punished. Fraud in banking is punished. Fraud in government documents is punished. Yet when fraud happens in intimate relationships, people tend to ignore the financial and emotional loss. They call it “bad breakup.” They call it “dating mistake.” But it is the same category of harm. A woman gives time, money, gifts, care, and sex based on false information. He receives profit. She receives loss. That is the definition of fraud.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes is a fraud.
Calling it “love” does not make it less criminal. Calling it “relationship issues” does not make it less serious. Women are targeted every day by men like Allan who want financial access without effort.
Allan grooms victims with fake romance. Allan manipulates women to give resources they would never give if they knew the truth.
This is fraud, and society needs to treat it as fraud, because it steals from women in every dimension of their lives.
Men who obtain sex through liesor false stories are committing a violent act that harms the whole person. When a woman gives consent based on false information, the consent is not real. Her body is being used under false conditions. Her mind is being tricked. Her emotions are being exploited. This is not a mutual choice. This is a violation of her right to decide based on truth.
Allan Amador Cervantes
Sexual consent requires honest information. When a man hides his intentions, hides major facts, or manipulates a woman with false claims of love, marriage, or loyalty, he steals her ability to choose. He forces her to participate in a sexual act she never would have chosen if she had known the truth. Her body is not the only thing that suffers. Her trust, her self belief, and her sense of safety suffer as well.
This is rape of the soul, body, and mind. It may not look violent on the surface. But the internal damage is deep. Women who have been deceived in this way often feel confusion, self doubt, shame, and grief. They feel invaded, not only physically, but psychologically. When sex is gained through deception, it destroys the foundation of human intimacy. It is a crime against the most private parts of a human being.
One woman’s story of being tricked into sexual relations with Allan: You Raped Me, Allan.
During the Covid pandemic, Sophie—a divorced mother with disabilities, 16 years older than Allan—moved from California to La Paz. She sought relief from lockdowns, rehabilitation through swimming the Sea of Cortez, and opportunities to volunteer for social causes.
Allan targets disabled woman trying to rehabilitate in Sea of Cortez
Facebook suggested Allan as a connection. His public profile presented him as a university rector and community figure. Sophie reached out, believing he could direct her toward volunteer opportunities. From the beginning, her intention was clear: service to the community, not romance.
But Allan’s response was not professional. By their second meeting, he invaded her personal space, he followed her home without consent, and he lied about where he lived. Sophie rejected him, but Allan pressed forward, promising introductions to volunteer opportunities. Soon he was swimming beside her, camping with her, dining with her.
For nine months, Allan concealed the truth about his living situation. He claimed to own a house being remodeled, managed by his brother, Christopher. In reality, he owns no property and he lives in his mother’s attic. When exposed, he said Sophie could not visit him at his mother’s house because his mother dislikes visitors. Witnesses confirm those excuses are false. Years later, having forgotten his lie, Allan also inadvertently confirmed this is false.
The deception served a purpose: to mask his poverty and to position Sophie’s luxury penthouse as a free lover’s pad.
This pattern continued. Allan feigned wealth, spoke of his substantial savings and investments, but let Sophie pay for dinners, hotels, and travel. When inside her penthouse overlooking the Mogote, he acted like a kept man—giving orders to staff, sweeping floors, lingering on the sofa, and “forgetting” personal items when he left so he would have to return. He offered love without action, commitment without cost. Un gigoló.
The financial imbalance grew clearer when Allan visited Sophie in California. He spoke of building a life together but expected her to fund it. He promised love and fidelity. Instead, he cultivated simultaneous relationships with other women, concealing them through lies: “I lost my phone,” “I am busy with politics,” “there’s no reception in Todos Santos,” “Kenno is sick.” He disappeared for weekends and holidays using his family as alibis while reassuring Sophie of his love.
When Sophie asked him before moving permanently to La Paz—risking her career, finances, and leaving family behind—he swore:
“I absolutely want you here with me.”
She drove a thousand miles across the desert on that promise, investing thousands of dollars, only to arrive to chaos. Allan was already entangled with Jody Waterman, conducting a public, sexually charged online relationship. He was secretly pursuing Pamela Sue Martin in Todos Santos and Idaho. And he was chasing pussy of all ages and nationalities, including a minor, all while keeping Sophie as his sexual doormat and financial safety net.
Suddenly, in summer 2023, Allan claimed his “rich cousin in Washington” had paid his first class expenses to Washington to help his cousin’s child.
I want to reiterate: Allan used not just this child in his lies, but also his minor nephews on other occasions.
In reality, this “rich cousin” was Pamela Sue Martin, thirty years his senior. Allan raved about her wealth and how “he” was paying for everything: dinners, flights, and all other travel expenses. The elaborate lie revealed the indisputable Mexican-gigolo strategy:
Allan targets older, wealthier women, using deceit to gain sexual access and financial benefits.
Allan’s deceit-for-sex career carries a critical legal implication: Idaho’s rape laws provide for prosectution for Artifice, Pretense, or Concealment and California law provides similar protections.
Un Gigoló Méxicano, Estafador Extraordinario
Family Complicity
Allan did not act alone. His family enables him. His mother knew he was traveling to various US states to spend time with different wealthy women old enough to be his mother.
Maria Elena cannot claim ignorance of his motives. Allan’s own words implicate his brother Christopher and sister-in-law Fernanda, who chauffeured him to airports. Allan further confided that Fernanda coached him on how to build trust and intimacy with these women.
The deception was not hidden from family; it was facilitated.
Family must consider their their own position, their own family standing, and draw a clear line between Allan’s disgrace and their households:
Protege a tu propia familia: tu matrimonio, tus hijos, la reputación de tu hogar.
No te dejes atrapar por la falsedad de Allan.
Elimina la contaminación: asegúrate de que tu rama del árbol genealógico no se vea mancillada por el engaño y la deshonra de Allan.
Allan lied for sex. He lied for money. He lied when truth would have served him better.
The lies multiplied beyond what one interview can contain. Sophie became ill under the weight of Allan’s chaos. She told him she was breaking down. Instead of easing the harm, Allan escalated it—feigning empathy while deepening betrayal. She left La Paz six months later, burdened with all the costs of migration, relocation, and remigration, while Allan continued to whisper promises: “I love you more than you know. I am coming soon to be with you. Kenno is sick.”
Kenno, Allan’s brother, was indeed sick. But Allan’s cruelty had nothing to do with that reality. Kenno was simply another alibi to cloak Allan’s relationships with other women.
In the end, Sophie received a single message that opened the floodgates of truth.
The pattern is undeniable: Allan lied for sex, lied for money, lied when truth would have served him better. His deceit is not incidental—it is pathological.
And his family stands by him, complicit in the harm.
In the below image, a young lady rightfully feels compelled to threaten Allan with violence for his ongoing inappropriate contact with her…three months after he told her mother he loved her…in a text message…one day after Allan was photographed in bed with Sophie.
Having trouble keeping track of Allan’s poor personal boundaries? There’s plenty more to see if you care to vomit.
“Therefore each of you must put off falsehood and speak truthfully to your neighbor, for we are all members of one body.” Ephesians 4:25 (NIV)
When one supply source threatens exposure, run to the other supply source and secure it.
She is the most vulnerable to the exact deception pattern outlined in Allan’s psychological profile.
Allan is actively bonding tighter to prevent losing her. She is in the jurisdiction where his deceptive sexual behavior is criminal. Silence protects him, not her.
He will repeat the same abuse cycle until she learns the truth and/or she is harmed.
“Patterns suggest efforts calculated to maintain influence, risking destabilization of romantic partners.”
Behind the social media posts, Allan is insecure and guarded.
His motive is to project momentum—to suggest that he is travelling, evolving, and succeeding. It’s a performative play, meant to contrast with stagnation or guilt. The overall messaging signals loneliness and a need to manage impressions carefully. What appears as openness online masks an emotionally sealed inner world.
Allan’s social media strategy is to establish trust and loyalty. He wishes to appear dependable and admired: “I am fine and stable.” The effect he seeks is reassurance from others that he is a good, steady person.
Loss of Self-Respect
Despite the calm surface, Allan has lost dignity and self-respect. He may gain likes, but his internal sense of moral authority has weakened.
The staged images are a shell around exhaustion and reduced self-esteem. His “travel the USA” motif is not a celebration of freedom, happiness, or success but an attempt to stay ahead of inner stagnation in his mother’s decayed attic.
Constant Effort
Allan’s social media persona requires constant effort to maintain. Behind the smile and the scenic background lies:
Strain and vigilance – he is besieged, as though he must continually defend his ground or reputation.
A need to appear strong – the photo becomes armor; it signals, “I’m fine, I’m still standing,” even when he feels outnumbered by criticism or shame.
Isolation – Allan is emotionally alone, fending off unseen challengers. His social media admiration does not equal belonging; it’s a fortress of presentation.
His mother’s idolization on social media only serves to solidify her co-perpetration: she knows everything.
He keeps posting to prove momentum and control. He is fighting to preserve a few loyal supporters. He knows his authority is eroding, and this public mask is his last line of defense.
So the serenity you see on social media isn’t genuine calm or content; it’s a sustained act of resistance—a disgraceful man trying to hold his ground as the truth unveils itself.
The first time someone told me that Allan is a liar, a user, and an abuser of women, I was incensed. Outraged! Furious.
I responded to that woman with scathing rebuke.
The Second Time
The second time someone told me that Allan was abusing women, I was angry. I denied it. It couldn’t be true. He is so charming and polite.
The Third Time
The third time someone told me that Allan was abusing women, I paused. I asked Allan about it. The idea was ridiculous, he said. “She’s a jealous woman, she’s crazy,” he told me.
The Fourth Time
The fourth time someone told me that Allan was abusing women, I investigated. I was deeply concerned by the evidence I found. I confronted him. He scoffed. I will never forget that smirk on his face.
The Fifth Time
The fifth time someone told me that Allan was abusing women, I investigated again. Allan was lying to me.
The Reign of Hell Began
I confronted him. He lied. I confronted him again. He lied again. I confronted him again. He created total destruction and chaos while simultaneously kissing me, telling me he loved me, and making love to me.
I Left Him
He pursued me again. Still avoiding the truth.
I left him again.
I Forgave Him
I should not have.
I wasn’t the only one he was lying to.
I wasn’t special. I wasn’t loved. This wasn’t the “Once in a Lifetime Love” we whispered about.
I was someone he was using because he needed admiration and attention. A ticket to the USA. That’s all.
Allan Sexually Violated Me.
The lies. The lies were emotional fraud.
But bringing someone else’s sexual energies into my bed, into my womb. Without my permission. He desecrated me.
idealization — emotional fraud & love bombing: I love you more than you know and I can’t wait to build memories together; our connection is even beyond ourselves. I cherish and relish all of your being; the purest feeling for one another; I always felt it; I love you since the very first time I saw you with an indescribable strength and passion; I am grateful for your love and kindness. I love you, regardless time and distance you are with me and I am with you, darling.; You are so important and valuable to me, beyond I can express. I love you deeply and passionately; We are building strong and deep memories, as well as pages in our lives. All I need and want is you❤️🔥; I am fully grateful for having found each other; how important you are in my life and all what you brought to me since I saw you that first time. You are my once in a lifetime.The intensity of my feelings for you is something never experienced before, the force that attracts me to you is so deep, authentic, and strong that stands on its own feet; I don’t want to be apart from you. You can count on me and I can rely on you for whatsoever. We were as two persons sharing the most valuable resources we have that are time and affection, and what I want always to be the foundation of our relationship no matter how it is named, expressed or lived, while HONEST. The best days of my life and it is because you were there, with me, renewing my heart and giving me what you are in the most pure sense of your existence. I LOVE YOU, I really mean it.
devaluing — lies, triangulation, gaslighting (You cannot come with me; I was working; I need to cancel our weekend plans -my brother needs me to drive him to Todos Santos; my nephews want me to take them to dinner; I lost my phone in Todos Santos over the weekend so I couldn’t call/text; my mother is planning dinner, she doesn’t like people so you are not invited; an important political figure is in town so I need to cancel weekend plans; I’m translating for court at night; I am in Washington (Idaho) with my cousin (Pamela Sue Martin), I will call you tomorrow, I will call you later, how dare you confront me about such a thing; stop asking me “what time!”; I’m not talking to you about how I feel!)
discarding — click
Shock. Chaos. Confusion.
Letter Received
Your boyfriend is sleeping with another woman. Here’s proof.
I could have Handled the Truth
“I don’t love you, I don’t want to be with you” would have been good enough for me. I could have walked away years sooner with dignity. With my sacred womb in tact.
Living with Anger
Now. I am angry at myself for overlooking the obvious.
Angry at myself for forgiving him.
Angry at myself for trusting his words when he said, “I want you here with me.”
Angry at myself for not realizing it was all about the money and the USA. It wasn’t about me.
I make no apologies for shining light on this truth.
I Hope No One Else Gets Hurt
His public persona is a fascinating study in the art of deception.
People want to believe what they see.
4000 Fake Followers
Thank You God
I’m deeply grateful for your gifts.
Violence in La Paz, Baja Califronia Sur
Note on Transparency: In the interest of accuracy and fairness, We will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content.
Abusers often project a public persona of strength and confidence to mask deep-seated insecurities, a behavior that becomes more pronounced under public scrutiny. This curated image—whether through charm, dominance, or displays of control—serves as a shield to hide vulnerabilities. In private, their insecurity may manifest as manipulation or aggression to maintain power over others, but in public, they double down on this “strong & happy” facade to deflect criticism or exposure. This dynamic is rooted in their fear of being seen as inadequate, driving them to craft an image that demands admiration rather than authenticity.
“Va a mi gym y se clava mirando a las morras como si fuera deporte. La neta, cómo nos echa ojo está bien creepy. Le decimos de broma ‘el galán’, pero la verdad nos da mala vibra, entonces tratamos de andar en bola cuando está por ahí. No es normal.” –Afectada
Social Media Overcompensation for Fragile Pride.
The intensification of this behavior under scrutiny often stems from an abuser’s need to maintain control over their narrative. When challenged or exposed, their insecurity fuels defensive tactics like exaggerated displays of confidence to preserve their carefully constructed persona. For example, an abuser might respond to criticism with grandiose boasts or public displays of authority to reassert dominance and suppress doubts about their character. This pattern not only protects their fragile self-image but also manipulates how others perceive them, making it harder for their abusive behavior to be recognized or addressed.
Abuse survivors must understand this behavior to recognize the disconnect between an abuser’s public image and their private actions. Awareness empowers survivors to break free from the manipulation, rebuild trust in their own perceptions, and seek support without being swayed by the abuser’s carefully crafted persona. By understanding this dynamic, survivors can better navigate their healing journey and protect themselves from further harm.
Awkward attempts at public displays of normalcy or success
Each new “I’m strong” post looks like damage control. The more he fights to maintain control of his image, the more the performance exposes his weakness.
He has no real path to recover his image without confronting the truth — and he won’t. Particularly as he surrounds himself with enablers rather than those who help him accept responsibility and transform for the betterment of self, his victims, and his community.
For Survivors We know the journey from shock to denial to realization to anger to recovery. If you need support along your journey, we are committed to protecting your identity. Reach out to us by email.
Note on Transparency: In the interest of accuracy and fairness, We will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content.
In every public case of abuse, there is at least one figure in the shadows — the enabler. She is not the headline. She is not the accused. Yet she advises him when to fight, when to hide, when to smile for the cameras.
From years of survivor advocacy, we know these “strategic advisors” often believe they are helping. In truth, they become part of the cycle that keeps abuse unchallenged.
They aim to help act as strategic advisors line-by-line. Sometimes they carry their own unresolved history — bitterness toward another woman, misguided loyalty, co-dependence, or the deep need to feel indispensable to a man in crisis.
More concerning, however, is the lack of qualifications in this highly specialized arena and lack of insight into deeply buried, carefully guarded savage secrets.
Yet simultaneously, without specialized qualifications and without the knowledge she needs to make informed decisions, she is called upon to advise, colsole, co-analyze, and defend. She is an enabler enabling a pathological abuser who cannot be satiated in a tormented intergenerational web of pursue-catch-conquer-discard. Viewing them all–the young, the elderly, the disabled–as Satan’s offering to him. Shrouded in family complicity.
While hundreds of enabler variations exist, the abuser’s enabler normally, though exceptions exists, fall into one of five common traits, which we highlight in the image below.
Abuse Enablers
We encourage those in this position to ask themselves:
Am I helping him avoid accountability?
Am I protecting his reputation at the cost of my own?
Am I prepared to be remembered as the one who shielded a man from the consequences of devouring the innocent?
Silence is not neutral. Support is not harmless. And the “loyal helper” is never truly invisible.
See “Educación” for a Spanish summary on enablers and their role in perpetuating harm.
For Survivors We know the journey from shock to denial to realization to anger to recovery. If you need support along your journey, we are committed to protecting your identity. Reach out to us by email.
For Enablers If you recognize yourself in these patterns, the most powerful thing you can do is step away, privately and permanently. You cannot save him without sacrificing your own integrity — and history remembers both the abuser and the one who stood beside him. Contact our Survivor Support Team if you need help.
Note on Transparency: In the interest of accuracy and fairness, We will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content.
When public image is under threat, abusive personalities often pivot into “wholesome overload” — flooding social media with symbols of innocence, purity, and moral authority. Pets. Bible verses. Family rhetoric.
This is not harmless. It is calculated. The performance says, “Trust me. I am gentle, safe, and righteous.” Meanwhile, the masked persona remains unchanged — sometimes existing in plain sight on other platforms.
Kittens to Kinks
This week offered a textbook example: one account displaying images crafted to inspire trust; another filled with connections to female sexual objectification. This contrast is not accidental. Contradiction is the strategy. It keeps victims doubting their own instincts, asking themselves, “Could someone so kind really be harmful?”
The mask on Instagram: A symbol of gentleness and virtue, chosen to evoke trust and affection.
The reality on X: Public alignment with content built on female sexual objectification.
Two platforms. Two stories. One truth.
We love adorable black kittens as much as anyone else. While we strongly encourage pets as a way to experience love, we are just as strongly concerned that carefully curated public imagery is an extension of the double-life playbook: Soft fur in public, hard-core in private.
If Allan has a new kitten, we wish he and the kitten all the best. But we fear the animal could be used as a prop in efforts to curate a more likable public image.
Survivors deserve truth, safety, and dignity. If you have experienced emotional, spiritual, or relational abuse, our Survivor Support Team is here to listen, believe you, and connect you with resources to rebuild your life. Contact us in complete confidentiality.
Pornography La Paz Baja California Sur Mexico
Note on Transparency: In the interest of accuracy and fairness, We will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content.
Woman is a gift of life, unity, and shared dominion.
Across history, Scripture has drawn a clear line between what God gives and what the forces of destruction seek to consume.
In Genesis 2:22, the phrase “he brought her to the man” implies a divine act of presentation — woman as a gift of life, unity, and shared dominion. In Revelation 12:4, the Beast stands before the woman, ready to devour what she brings forth.
“The beast I saw resembled a leopard, but had feet like those of a bear and a mouth like that of a lion. The dragon gave the beast his power and his throne and great authority.” — Revelation 13:2
What God gives as a gift, the Beast seeks to destroy.
Patterns of Abuse
Patterns of emotional and psychological abuse are clear and consistent:
Idealization — overwhelming attention, promises, and moral posturing.
Devaluation — gaslighting, triangulation, lying, public humiliation, emotional sabotage.
Discard — withdrawal, chaos, ghosting, and refusal to provide truthful discourse.
When a man convinces a woman to trust him, to love him, to be with him and then abuses her, the pattern moves beyond imitation of evil into embodiment of it.
Such men stand condemned in the eyes of God, for they wage war against His creation, His image-bearers, and His gift to man.
One recent example in La Paz shows how this pattern manifests in real life. Multiple survivors, across years, describe the same sequence of behaviors.
Tactic One: Triangulation
Triangulation is when an abuser uses a third party to provoke jealousy or competition, destabilizing the relationship and asserting control.
Example: Survivors report that Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes used Jody Waterman as an instrument of triangulation to devalue his partner, [redacted].
As his defense, he mocked Jody as “crazy” for her “mysterious” obsession with him — even ridiculing her for purchasing the same book (How to Love) that his girlfriend, [redacted], had gifted him.
“He was calling Jody crazy and I was thinking maybe she is crazy. But something inside of me kept thinking he is responsible for her craziness because no woman idealizes a man like that without significant encouragement. These public posts must be just the tip of the iceberg.” — [redacted]
Tactic Two: Gaslighting
Gaslighting is the deliberate distortion of reality to make the victim question their own perceptions, often accompanied by shaming language.
Example: When confronted, Allan erupted into a torrent of gaslighting — even calling [redacted] a “teenager” for questioning his and Jody’s public messages on Facebook. This occurred just three months after he encouraged [redacted] to move to La Paz at her expense, while simultaneously pursuing multiple other women, at least one Idaho woman who clearly believed Allan was her loyal partner at the time.
[redacted] clarified Allan’s allegation that she did contain herself and talk “in front of him” about it, so his attack served as additional layers of painful gaslilghting.
Tactic Three: Labeling
Abusers often neutralize credibility by attaching derogatory labels to those who confront them.
Example:
Allan labels Jody “crazy.” Pamela is “insanely jealous.” He dismissed [redacted] as “disrespecting his space” and “trespassing boundaries” when she confronted his triangulation.
This is the “mask” — public morality and virtue-signaling that conceals private exploitation.
Allan’s posts about Christian virtue, cute kittens, travel to beautiful places, and family values serve as intentional public distractionsfrom his private reality.
In present-day Mexico — where violence against women is layered, nuanced, and multidimensional — these patterns are part of a continuum of harm that too often ends in femicide.
Why Silence is Deadly
Silence and shame cause even the strongest women to collapse — and when a woman collapses, so do her children’s futures.
“Cry aloud, spare not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and show my people their transgression.” — Isaiah 58:1
To remain silent is to hand the Beast our souls.
Speaking Protects the Next Victim
If you have experienced emotional, spiritual, or relational abuse, ourSurvivor Support Team is here to listen, believe you, and connect you with resources in full confidentiality.
Truth is the first act of protection.
These are not “private issues.” They are part of the continuum of harm that ends in femicide. We cannot remain silent.
Note on Transparency: In the interest of accuracy and fairness, We will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content.
In the holy book of Revelation, “the Beast” is a satanic instrument of chaos, deception, and destruction, seeking to dominate and devastate humanity on a global scale.
La Paz, BCS Mexico
Triangulating Mother & Daughter
Today, we learned through evidence that, in addition to exploiting elderly women, Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes pursued a mother and her daughter just two weeks apart, while emotionally defrauding and bedding other women during the same two-week period. THE MARK OF THE BEAST.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes’ debauchery is aligned with the Beast
Conquer & DestroyWomen
Evidence shows: Allan love bombs, gaslights, emotionally defrauds, triangulates, and discards women as if they are Satan’s whores instead of God’s sacred gifts.
Allan is not simply a prolific abuser camouflaging himself behind a carefully curated mask of Christian morality and patriarchal virtue.
Allan is not a sinner in need of redemption.
Allan is an active, irredeemable enemy of God.
“The Beast was given power to wage war against God’s holy people and to conquer them.”
Revelation 13:7 (NIV)
The women Allan abused are honorable women. Loyal servants of God. Most are mothers who carried heavy crosses to not only survive, but ensure her children thrived against all odds. Many are elderly (30+ years his senior). Some without fathers or brothers to protect them. Open, vulnerable hearts. Perfect targets.
I vomitted as I penned this post to relieve my throat of choking agony. Viewing evidence of the Beast’s spiritual warfare against a mother and her daughter was a bigger lump than I could swallow. My body had to expel the shock and horror.
Your Testimony is Spiritual Victory
God promised triumph over the Beast through testimony:
“They triumphed over him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony; they did not love their lives so much as to shrink from death.” —Revelation 12:11 (NIV)
Beware of carefully curated public images
The Beast’s destruction is swift, complete, and orchestrated by God
The Beast does not prevail in his battle with God. Along with a False Prophet, he is thrown alive into the “lake of fire burning with sulfur” (Revelation 19:20), a symbol of eternal torment and final judgment. This act destroys the Beast’s physical and spiritual influence forever, without any resurrection or further opportunity to abuse God’s women like Satan’s whores.
“And I saw what looked like a sea of glass glowing with fire and, standing beside the sea, those who had been victorious over the beast and its image and over the number of its name. They held harps given them by God.”
—Revelation 15:2 (NIV)
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
Through direct divine judgment, Allan’s reign of terror is over. A Faithful and true leader has emerged, leading the armies of heaven. He calls upon us to use our power, the gifts He bestowed upon us, to help others see Him, His light, His glory, and to experience His faithful love.
Your Story
We are committed to protecting your identity. If you have a story or evidence you think we should be aware of, contact us by email.
When a young, innocent girl experiences such disgust at your hands that she is compelled to threaten you with violence, you are God’s enemy.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
Violence Baja California Sur, Mexico
Note on Transparency:
In the interest of accuracy and fairness, we will publish any credible counter-narrative or evidence Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes wishes to provide in response to the information on this site. As of the date of this publication, he has not requested removal or correction of any content.
AllanCervantes.com has become a stage for the collective shadow—where not only the impact of domestic violence, fraud, and rape is revealed but broader themes of cultural misogyny, communal apathy, and intergenerational abuse are laid bare.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes
This confrontation is necessary for cultural individuation—the maturation of a community’s moral center through reckoning with uncomfortable truths.
Allan’s website operates as a form of shadow exorcism. It forces into public consciousness what Allan privately and publicly denied for the PROTECTION OF WOMEN, CHILDREN, MEN, COMMUNITIES, AND GLOBAL ORDER.
