You raped me, Allan. You raped her, Allan.
And you tried to rape others, Allan.
Tag: fraud
-
Me Violaste, Allan
Allan Amador Cervatnes -
Violence Against Women in Mexico
Allan Amador Cervantes is most certainly the most violent man in La Pas, Baja California Sur or even in all of Mexico. Why?
Not because of the emotional blood he spilled—though there is plenty—but because his violence is architectural.
He built his violence over years: blueprints of deception, load-bearing lies, hidden passages of alibi. Every victim is studied, courted, isolated. He doesn’t explode; he engineers. Friends and family are recruited as pillars in his façade—unwitting shields—until the structure of violence stands complete and lethal.
Allan’s absence of remorse is the final cruelty. When confronted, he never flinches. He denies with serene certainty, redirects blame with surgical calm, as if the rapes, the fraud, the shattered lives were mere misunderstandings he was too macho to acknowledge. That refusal—that arrogant, airtight refusal to account for what he knows he has done—is the deepest cut. It leaves wounds that never close, bleeding doubt into everyone who had ever believed him.
True violence in a serial predator often lies less in the physical act than in the sustained psychological domination—planning erodes autonomy, deception recruits bystanders into complicity, and denial gaslights entire communities. This creates a wider radius of harm than any single act of physical violence.
Allan Amador Cervantes -
See You Soon “Future Faking”
See You Soon: A Tool of Psychological Manipulation
Allan uses the phrase “see you soon” as a weapon to manipulate relationships by persistently uttering the phrase without any genuine intent to follow through.
Allan’s tactic, known as FUTURE FAKING, involves dangling vague promises of future contact or commitment to string someone along, often keeping them as a secondary option while pursuing primary interests elsewhere.
Allan Amador Cervantes By repeatedly saying “I’ll see you soon” or “I’ll call tomorrow” without action, Allan fosters hope and emotional investment, ensuring his victim remains available and compliant—waiting patiently on the sidelines.
When confronted about the lack of follow-through, Allan deflects responsibility by blaming “cultural differences,” claiming that in Mexican culture, “soon” (like “pronto” or “ahorita”) is inherently flexible and not meant literally. This excuse weaponizes a real cultural nuance to evade accountability.
Allan shifts blame onto a woman’s “unreasonable” expectations or supposed character flaws, conditioning her to suppress questions. Any pushback triggers anger, withdrawal, sulking, or silent treatment, punishing her for demanding clarity and reinforcing compliance through fear of abandonment.
“This is exactly what Allan did to me. He shouted at me for seeking confirmation of “when, what time,” as if I was the unreasonable person. He always, for years and to the bitter end, told me, “I will see you soon,” “I will call you tomorrow” and I now realize just how insidious and how abusive he really is.” — Survivor of Allan’s Abuse
Allan’s pattern is sinister and pathological: it degrades self-esteem, destabilizes emotional security, and maintains control via intermittent hope mixed with chronic lying and parallel relationships.
Recognize it as abuse, not culture—true cultural flexibility doesn’t involve deliberate deception or punitive reactions to boundaries.
Abusers exploit any stereotype (cultural, gender, or otherwise) to gaslight; document patterns and seek support to break the cycle. Prioritize actions over words for healthier connections.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes is a psychologically violent man. Do not mistake his outward kindness, lack of direct confrontation, or passive-aggressive communication style as anything short of violent.
-
Single
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes No matter who he had in his life, Allan denied her existence.
-
How Sad
“What is Jody Waterman’s obsession with you?”
“I don’t know. She’s crazy.”
Allan Amador Cervantes Disgusting. Disgrace. Despicable. Defilement.
-
Mentally Unstable
Allan was recently caught in another lie. Unfortunately, we cannot expose it without compromising the safety of informants. But the lie is quite significant, as it involves his immediate family. As previously highlighted in his psychological profile and in “Bueno Allan,” he used his family and friends to bolster a claim that is not just false, but harmful to his family.
We also learned recently that in December 2022, Allan used his poor mother as an exuse and alibi for why he couldn’t travel for Christmas. The real reason: Pamela Sue Martin. Yet, just three months later, Allan told his California girlfriend he wanted her in La Paz with him, compelling her to make a 1000 km journey by car to be with him.
He literally lied to his girlfriend about Pamela since at least July 2022. He was lying when he visited her in California. And he has never told the truth to this day. She only discovered their love affair through a third party three years later.
Three years of confusing behaviors, reality distortion, and spinning lies is a long time. Enough time to establish malicious criminal intent.
Or is Allan just mentally unstable?
Allan Amador Cervantes -
Allan belongs in Jail
Allan created a false reality for multiple women.
False reality does not mean fantasy or idealization.
It means:
- Ongoing deception
- Withheld information that would have altered choice
- Parallel lives and concealed behaviors
- A relational frame that was structurally false
The key point:
She consented to a version of reality that did not exist due to Allan’s deliberate deception.That produces rape, not a mutually fun night at the El Moro Hotel.
This does not imply:
- She was naive
- She imagined intimacy
- The sexual bond was fake
It means the attachment was formed using corrupted inputs due to Allan’s intentional emotional fraud.
Why Allan belongs in jail
Allan’s emotional fraud, multiple sexual violations, and blatant discard tactics caused real-world harm, which he refuses to acknowledge.
The impact of his conduct is criminal. If he had resources worth suing for, that could potentially help mitigate the damages. But he is not only financially poor, he is spiritually bankrupt.
Therefore, the only socially suitable consequences is jail, where he can experience the same sexual violations he perpetrated on innocent women: Non-consensual.
Allan Amador Cervantes -
Allan Cheats on Everone
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes Cheats on Everyone! Lisa was a 75-year old American grandmother who he arranged to meet at Cafe Exquisito in La Paz. When she confronted him about flirting with her, he responded that there was no reason not to—despite the multiple women who thought he loved them.
What a dick. Pendejo.
Then he has the audacity to act offended that covert operations were an absolute necessity to unveil the truth. Typical gaslilghting abuse tactic: Reverse the blame, one of Allan’s favorite violences against women.
🖕🖕🖕
-
Evil Intent
“I sometimes try to make excuses for him to argue with myself that he really is not THAT bad. Maybe he lied because he didn’t want to hurt me. But that argument quickly falls apart because the truth was the path of least resistance; the truth is the one thing that would have brought peace in the most graceful and dignified manner.
No, he acted out of evil intent. He intentionally deceived me (and her). He’s still hiding the truth even three years later.
The lies were not about protecting me. The lies were about cheating me, controlling knowledge, preventing me from informed decision-making. For his sake. For his sexual and predatorial deviance.
I cannot make any excuse for him that stands up to reason. Simply put, Allan is a predator, a rapist, an abuser, a liar, a manipulator. And his family are enablers.
The Amador Cervantes clan are the potholes of society.”
–Survivor of Allan’s abuse
Amador Cervantes -
Bigger than Betrayal
Allan Amador Cervantes Allan weaponized love through fraud, secrecy, and impunity.
She countered with the tools of a nation-state—visibility, documentation, digital permanence.
What unfolded was not heartbreak.
Power corrected itself on a geopolitical scale. -
Embarrassed for You
Your claim that I wanted your help with my ex-husband and your claim that I wanted you to support me is an incredible embarrassment for you. I am embarrassed for you.
I know that you know both of these things are astronomical lies with not even the slightest fragment of truth. Embarrassing lies. Just as the lie that “your house” was being remodeled when in fact you had no house and lived with your mother.
Aren’t you ashamed? Aren’t you humiliated by your own lies? What’s it like knowing that I know the truth and that I know for a fact that you are a delusional liar? What an embarrassment!
And there’s not a single shred of evidence you can produce to even remotely justify such absurd nonsense lies!
If you are not humiliated by being caught in these lies (and more), then you are most certainly a sociopath.
It’s astounding! You are unreal.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes -
Coward
How could you lie so much? Why not just tell me the truth as soon as you knew it? You could have made life so much easier for both of us. It wasn’t enough to desecrate one white woman?
Coward You are a disgusting coward, Allan. The bowels of the Beast.
-
Fraud in Intimacy: Strategy for Personal Gain
Fraud is the act of gaining benefit by lying.
When a man, such as Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes, lies to a woman to get sex, money, housing, travel, or immigration advantage, he is committing fraud. He is gaining valuable things from her under false terms. He is presenting himself as something he is not. He promises things, including love, he never intends to give. This is not “playing around.” This is not romance. This is not misunderstanding. This is deliberate deception for personal gain.
Allan Amador Cervantes Fraud in business is punished. Fraud in banking is punished. Fraud in government documents is punished. Yet when fraud happens in intimate relationships, people tend to ignore the financial and emotional loss. They call it “bad breakup.” They call it “dating mistake.” But it is the same category of harm. A woman gives time, money, gifts, care, and sex based on false information. He receives profit. She receives loss. That is the definition of fraud.
Allan Alexander Amador Cervantes is a fraud.
Calling it “love” does not make it less criminal. Calling it “relationship issues” does not make it less serious. Women are targeted every day by men like Allan who want financial access without effort.
Allan grooms victims with fake romance. Allan manipulates women to give resources they would never give if they knew the truth.
This is fraud, and society needs to treat it as fraud, because it steals from women in every dimension of their lives.